Chung E, Conneely E, Ruo R, Foley M, Seuntjens J
McGill University, Montreal, QC.
National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Med Phys. 2012 Jul;39(7Part3):4629. doi: 10.1118/1.4740132.
The IAEA-AAPM new dosimetry formalism [Med. Phys. 35, 5179 (2008)] was applied to clinical IMRT quality assurance (QA). Twenty different IMRT QA fields were created on the CT images of a 30×30×17 cm Solid Water™ phantom. Two Farmer-type chambers, Exradin A12 and NE2571, and a smaller Exradin A1SL ionization chamber were cross-calibrated against a reference detector, the PTW micro liquid ion chamber (microLion), in the lowest dose gradient region in each IMRT QA field delivery. Based on the new dosimetry formalism, the clinical correction factor was measured in a fully-rotated delivery and a delivery at a single gantry angle, a collapsed delivery. For the calibrated Exradin A12, the measured dose with the clinical correction factor was compared with a calculated dose using Monte Carlo (MC) methods. The clinical correction factor deviated from unity by up to 2.4% and 3.7% in the fully-rotated and collapsed deliveries, respectively, depending on the dose distribution in the chamber collecting volume. For the Exradin A1SL, the correction factor was generally closer to unity due to the reduced dose gradient on the smaller collecting volume. In the fully-rotated delivery, the measured dose with the clinical correction factor is different from the MC-calculated dose to within 4%; while the discrepancy was greater, up to 8%, in the collapsed delivery due to the much heterogeneous dose distribution in the chamber collecting volume. This work proves that the suggested dosimetry technique is effective to improve the dosimetric consistency of clinical IMRT QA.
国际原子能机构-医学物理和医学工程学会新剂量学形式体系[《医学物理》35, 5179 (2008)]被应用于临床调强放射治疗(IMRT)质量保证(QA)。在一个30×30×17 cm的固体水模体的CT图像上创建了20个不同的IMRT QA射野。将两个Farmer型电离室,Exradin A12和NE2571,以及一个较小的Exradin A1SL电离室与一个参考探测器——PTW微型液体电离室(微型电离室)在每个IMRT QA射野输出的最低剂量梯度区域进行交叉校准。基于新的剂量学形式体系,在全旋转输出和单个机架角度输出(一种压缩输出)中测量临床校正因子。对于校准后的Exradin A12,将使用临床校正因子测量的剂量与使用蒙特卡罗(MC)方法计算的剂量进行比较。临床校正因子在全旋转输出和压缩输出中分别偏离统一值高达2.4%和3.7%,这取决于电离室收集体积内的剂量分布。对于Exradin A1SL,由于较小收集体积上剂量梯度的降低,校正因子通常更接近统一值。在全旋转输出中,使用临床校正因子测量的剂量与MC计算的剂量相差在4%以内;而在压缩输出中差异更大,高达8%,这是由于电离室收集体积内剂量分布的异质性更强。这项工作证明了所建议的剂量学技术对于提高临床IMRT QA的剂量学一致性是有效的。