Danto Marylène, Witzmann Florian, Pierce Stephanie E, Fröbisch Nadia B
Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Invalidenstraße 43, Berlin, 10115, Germany.
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138.
J Morphol. 2017 Sep;278(9):1262-1283. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20709. Epub 2017 May 18.
A variety of vertebral centrum morphologies have evolved within early tetrapods which range from multipartite centra consisting of intercentra and pleurocentra in stem-tetrapods, temnospondyls, seymouriamorphs, and anthracosaurs up to monospondylous centra in lepospondyls. With the present study, we aim to determine the formation of both intercentrum and pleurocentrum and asked whether these can be homologized based on their bone histology. Both intercentra and pleurocentra ossified endochondrally and periosteal bone was subsequently deposited on the outer surface of the centra. Our observations indicate low histological variation between intercentrum and pleurocentrum in microstructural organization and growth which inhibits the determination of homologies. However, intercentrum and pleurocentrum development differs during ontogeny. As previously assumed, the intercentrum arises from ventrally located and initially paired ossification centers that fuse ventromedially to form the typical, crescentic, rhachitomous intercentrum. In contrast, presacral pleurocentra may be ancestrally represented by four ossification centers: a ventral and a dorsal pair. Subsequently, two divergent developmental patterns are observed: In stem-tetrapods and temnospondyls, the pleurocentrum evolves from the two dorsally located ossification centers which may occasionally fuse to form a dorsal crescent. In some dvinosaurian temnospondyls, the pleurocentrum may even ossify to full rings. In comparison, the pleurocentrum of stem-amniotes (anthracosaurs, chroniosuchids, seymouriamorphs, and lepospondyls) arises from the two ventrally located ossification centers whereby the ossification pattern is almost identical to that of temnospondyls but mirror-inverted. Thus, the ring-shaped pleurocentrum of Discosauriscus ossifies from ventral to dorsal. We also propose that the ossified portions of the intercentrum and pleurocentrum continued as cartilaginous rings or discs that surrounded the notochord in the living animals.
在早期四足动物中,已经演化出了多种椎体形态,从茎型四足动物、离片椎类、蜥螈形类和炭蜥目中由间椎体和侧椎体组成的多部分椎体,到壳椎类中的单椎体。在本研究中,我们旨在确定间椎体和侧椎体的形成,并探讨能否根据它们的骨组织学将其同源化。间椎体和侧椎体均通过软骨内成骨方式骨化,随后骨膜骨沉积在椎体的外表面。我们的观察表明,间椎体和侧椎体在微观结构组织和生长方面的组织学差异较小,这阻碍了同源性的确定。然而,间椎体和侧椎体在个体发育过程中的发育情况有所不同。如先前所假设的,间椎体起源于位于腹侧且最初成对的骨化中心,这些中心在腹内侧融合形成典型的新月形、脊索型间椎体。相比之下,骶前侧椎体可能在祖先中由四个骨化中心代表:一对腹侧和一对背侧。随后,观察到两种不同的发育模式:在茎型四足动物和离片椎类中,侧椎体由两个位于背侧的骨化中心演化而来,它们偶尔会融合形成一个背侧新月形。在一些双椎类离片椎类中,侧椎体甚至可能骨化形成完整的环。相比之下,茎型羊膜动物(炭蜥目、始鳄类、蜥螈形类和壳椎类)的侧椎体由两个位于腹侧的骨化中心产生,其骨化模式与离片椎类几乎相同,但呈镜像反转。因此,盘齿龙的环形侧椎体从腹侧到背侧骨化。我们还提出,间椎体和侧椎体的骨化部分在活体动物中继续作为围绕脊索的软骨环或盘存在。