Carroll M, Cheung J, Zhang L, Court L
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part19):3834. doi: 10.1118/1.4735649.
To understand the dose-response of the esophagus in photon and proton therapy, it is important to appreciate the variations in delivered dose caused by inter- and intra-fraction motion.
Four lung cancer patients were identified who had experienced grade 3 esophagitis during their treatment, and for whom their esophagus was close, but not encompassed by, the treatment volume. Each patient had been treated with proton therapy using 35-37 2Gy fractions, and had received weekly 4DCT imaging. IMRT plans were also created using the same treatment planning constraints. In-house image registration software was used to deform the esophagus contour from the treatment plan to each phase of the 4DCT for each weekly image set. Daily setup using both bony and soft tissue (GTV) registration was simulated, and the treatment dose calculated for each CT image. Changes to the esophagus DVH relative to the treatment plan were quantified in terms of the relative volume of the esophagus receiving 45, 55, and 65Gy (V45, V55 and V65).
For all combinations of treatment modality (photon, proton) and setup method (bony, GTV), intra-fraction motion resulted in a range of V45, V55 and V65 from 3.6 to 5.5%. Inter-fraction motion comparing daily exhale or inhale phases showed the range of V45, V55 and V65 from 8.5 to 18.6% (exhale) and 9.8 to 16.3% (inhale).
Inter-fractional motion resulted in larger variations in dose delivered to the esophagus than intra-fractional motion. The inter-fraction range for V45, V55 and V65 varied by around 10% between patients. The treatment modality (photon, proton) and setup technique (bony, GTV) had minimal impact on the results.
为了解光子和质子治疗中食管的剂量反应,认识到分次间和分次内运动引起的剂量变化很重要。
确定了4例在治疗期间发生3级食管炎的肺癌患者,其食管靠近但未被治疗靶区包绕。每位患者均接受了35 - 37次2Gy的质子治疗,并每周进行4DCT成像。还使用相同的治疗计划约束条件创建了调强放疗(IMRT)计划。使用内部图像配准软件将治疗计划中的食管轮廓变形到每周图像集的4DCT的每个时相。模拟了使用骨性和软组织(GTV)配准的每日摆位,并为每个CT图像计算治疗剂量。相对于治疗计划,食管剂量体积直方图(DVH)的变化通过接受45、55和65Gy(V45、V55和V65)的食管相对体积进行量化。
对于治疗方式(光子、质子)和摆位方法(骨性、GTV)的所有组合,分次内运动导致V45、V55和V65的范围为3.6%至5.5%。比较每日呼气或吸气时相的分次间运动显示,V45、V55和V65的范围为呼气时8.5%至18.6%,吸气时9.8%至16.3%。
分次间运动导致输送至食管的剂量变化比分次内运动更大。患者之间V45、V55和V65的分次间范围变化约为10%。治疗方式(光子、质子)和摆位技术(骨性、GTV)对结果的影响最小。