• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SU-E-T-591: Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Carcinomas of the Pituitary Adenomas: A Treatment Planning Comparison with Fixed Field IMRT.

作者信息

Sun T, Liu T, Yin Y

机构信息

Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jinan, Shandong.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part19):3841-3842. doi: 10.1118/1.4735680.

DOI:10.1118/1.4735680
PMID:28517077
Abstract

PURPOSE

A treatment planning study was performed to compare volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy against conventional fixed field IMRT on pituitary adenomas cancer patients.

METHODS

CT datasets of 10 patients affected by carcinoma of the pituitary adenomas were included and four plans were generated for each case: fixed five-Fields and seven-Fields IMRT, single (RA1)- and double (RA2)-modulated arcs with the RapidArc technique. The radiation dose was prescribed as 45 Gy in 25 fractions. DVHs were adopted for the statistics of above parameters, as well as conformal index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), dose-volumetric parameters of normal tissues, total accelerator output MUs and total treatment time.

RESULTS

Target coverage resulted basically equivalent among four plans. CI and HI were 0.84±0.04, 0.84±0.03, 0.86±0.03, 0.85±0.04 and 9.03±1.05 8.39±1.55, 10.02±1.30, 10.59±1.30, respectively. The V20Gy (in %) and V40Gy (in %) of brainstem were 30.48±16.84, 10.23±7.47, 21.34 ±12.2, 26.4±12.1 and 5.06±4.37, 4.27±4.49, 3.97±4.45, 4.49±4.56, repectively. The max dose(Gy)of Optic nerve-right and Optic nerve-left were 31.87±12.04, 33.23±12.65, 28.96 ±13.42, 28.68±12.63 and 33.15±12.51, 34.15±11.51, 30.37 ±12.41,30.09±11.34 .Concerning the healthy brain tissue: V20Gy (in %) was 7.11 ± 2.1,7.92 ±2.7, 8.12 ± 1.8 and 8.0 ± 2.0, respectively. The number of computed MU/fraction were 580 ± 69 (5-IMRT), 598 ± 112 (7- IMRT),474 ±43(RA1), and 477 ± 77 (RA2) .

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, rapidarc showed improvement in organ at risk sparing with uncompromised target coverage .Rapidarc could lead to the less MU and shortor delivery time compared to IMRT.

摘要

相似文献

1
SU-E-T-591: Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Carcinomas of the Pituitary Adenomas: A Treatment Planning Comparison with Fixed Field IMRT.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part19):3841-3842. doi: 10.1118/1.4735680.
2
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: a dosimetric and treatment efficiency comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy.立体定向适形放疗治疗脑转移瘤:容积旋转调强弧形治疗与调强放疗的剂量学和治疗效率比较。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Oct;9(5):499-507. doi: 10.1177/153303461000900508.
3
Volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the anal canal: A treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT.容积调强弧形放疗用于肛管癌:与固定野调强放疗的治疗计划比较
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jul;92(1):118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.020. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
4
Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT.容积调强弧形放疗用于口咽、下咽和喉癌:与固定野调强放疗的治疗计划比较
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jul;92(1):111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
5
Plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) and conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in anal canal cancer.容积旋转调强弧形治疗(RapidArc)与常规调强放射治疗(IMRT)在肛管癌中的计划比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2010 Oct 13;5:92. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-92.
6
A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.一项针对子宫颈癌放射治疗的治疗计划研究,比较容积弧形调强放疗与容积旋转调强放疗及固定野调强放疗。
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Nov;89(2):180-91. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
7
3D-conformal RT, fixed-field IMRT and RapidArc, which one is better for esophageal carcinoma treated with elective nodal irradiation.三维适形放疗、固定野调强放疗和 RapidArc 放疗,对于选择性淋巴结照射治疗食管癌,哪一种更好。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Oct;10(5):487-94. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500225.
8
SU-E-T-574: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Prostate Radiation: A Dosimetric Comparison between VMAT Techniques and Fixed-Beam IMRT.SU-E-T-574:容积调强弧形放疗用于前列腺癌放射治疗:VMAT技术与固定野IMRT的剂量学比较
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part19):3837-3838. doi: 10.1118/1.4735663.
9
Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and a novel IMRT & Arc technique for esophageal carcinoma.螺旋断层放疗、RapidArc 与新型调强放疗和弧形技术治疗食管癌的剂量学比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Dec;101(3):431-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.030. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
10
Dosimetry Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Rapid Arcand Fixed Field Dynamic IMRT for Local-Regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.容积旋转调强弧形治疗(VMAT)与固定野动态调强放疗(FF-DIMRT)治疗局部进展期鼻咽癌的剂量学比较
Chin J Cancer Res. 2011 Dec;23(4):259-64. doi: 10.1007/s11670-011-0259-0.