• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估多点起搏(MPP)在心脏再同步治疗中的安全性和有效性的随机试验的原理与设计:MPP试验

Rationale and design of a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The MPP Trial.

作者信息

Tomassoni Gery, Baker James, Corbisiero Raffaele, Love Charles, Martin David, Sheppard Robert, Worley Seth J, Lee Kwangdeok, Niazi Imran

机构信息

Baptist Health Lexington, Lexington, KY, USA.

Saint Thomas Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017 Nov;22(6). doi: 10.1111/anec.12448. Epub 2017 May 18.

DOI:10.1111/anec.12448
PMID:28517367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6931776/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the majority of Class III congestive heart failure (HF) patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) show a clinical benefit, up to 40% of patients do not respond to CRT. This paper reports the design of the MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) trial, a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CRT using MPP compared to standard biventricular (Bi-V) pacing.

METHODS

A maximum of 506 patients with a standard CRT-D indication will be enrolled at up to 50 US centers. All patients will be implanted with a CRT-D system (Quartet LV lead Model 1458Q with a Quadra CRT-D, Abbott) that can deliver both MPP and Bi-V pacing. Standard Bi-V pacing will be activated at implant. At 3 months postimplant, patients in whom the echocardiographic parameters during MPP are equal or better than during Bi-V pacing are randomized (1:1) to either an MPP or Bi-V arm.

RESULTS

The primary safety endpoint is freedom from system-related complications at 9 months. Each patient's response to CRT will be evaluated using a heart-failure clinical composite score, consisting of a change in NYHA functional class, patient global assessment score, HF events, and cardiovascular death. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of responders in the MPP arm compared with the Bi-V arm between 3 and 9 months.

CONCLUSION

This trial seeks to evaluate whether MPP via a single quadripolar LV lead improves hemodynamic and clinical responses to CRT, both in clinical responders and nonresponders.

摘要

背景

尽管大多数接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的Ⅲ级充血性心力衰竭(HF)患者显示出临床获益,但仍有高达40%的患者对CRT无反应。本文报告了多点起搏(MPP)试验的设计,这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照研究,旨在评估与标准双心室(Bi-V)起搏相比,使用MPP进行CRT的安全性和有效性。

方法

最多506例有标准CRT-D适应症的患者将在美国多达50个中心入组。所有患者将植入一个CRT-D系统(带有Quadra CRT-D的1458Q型Quartet左心室导线,雅培公司),该系统能够进行MPP和Bi-V起搏。植入时激活标准Bi-V起搏。在植入后3个月,MPP期间超声心动图参数等于或优于Bi-V起搏期间的患者被随机(1:1)分为MPP组或Bi-V组。

结果

主要安全终点是9个月时无系统相关并发症。使用心力衰竭临床综合评分评估每位患者对CRT的反应,该评分由纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级的变化、患者总体评估评分、HF事件和心血管死亡组成。主要疗效终点是3至9个月期间MPP组与Bi-V组中反应者的比例。

结论

本试验旨在评估通过单根四极左心室导线进行的MPP是否能改善临床反应者和无反应者对CRT的血流动力学和临床反应。

相似文献

1
Rationale and design of a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The MPP Trial.评估多点起搏(MPP)在心脏再同步治疗中的安全性和有效性的随机试验的原理与设计:MPP试验
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017 Nov;22(6). doi: 10.1111/anec.12448. Epub 2017 May 18.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial.多点起搏在心脏再同步治疗中的安全性和有效性:多点起搏试验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 26;3(13):1510-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
3
Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II).多点起搏治疗评估心脏再同步治疗的安全性和有效性的随机临床试验的原理和设计:多点起搏(MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II)的更多反应。
Am Heart J. 2019 Mar;209:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
4
Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I.多点起搏(MORE-CRT MPP)研究中对心脏再同步治疗无反应者向有反应者转换率:I 期研究结果。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Sep 14;40(35):2979-2987. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz109.
5
Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.在单个冠状窦分支中进行多点左心室起搏可改善心脏再同步治疗的中期超声心动图表现及临床反应。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/jce.12513. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
6
Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing.多点左心室起搏与大解剖分离可改善对常规双心室起搏有反应和无反应者的逆向重构和对心脏再同步治疗的反应。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Feb;109(2):183-193. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01499-7. Epub 2019 May 31.
7
Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year.左心室起搏部位优化联合多点起搏可改善1年时的心脏重构及心脏再同步治疗的临床反应。
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Aug;13(8):1644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.05.015.
8
Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the MORE-CRT MPP trial.MORE-CRT MPP 试验中心力再同步治疗无反应者到有反应者的转化率。
Europace. 2023 Oct 5;25(10). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad294.
9
Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study.通过多点左心室起搏改善心脏再同步治疗反应:12个月随访研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jun;12(6):1250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
10
Left Ventricular Enlargement, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Efficacy, and Impact of MultiPoint Pacing.左心室扩大、心脏再同步治疗效果及多点起搏的影响。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;13(11):e008680. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008680. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac Reverse Remodeling in Ischemic Heart Disease with Novel Therapies for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.缺血性心脏病中的心脏逆向重塑及射血分数降低的心力衰竭的新型治疗方法
Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 13;13(4):1000. doi: 10.3390/life13041000.
2
Anodal Capture for Multisite Pacing with a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead: A Feasibility Study.使用四极左心室导线进行多部位起搏的阳极夺获:一项可行性研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 15;10(24):5886. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245886.
3
Advances in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.心脏再同步治疗的进展
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019 Jun 15;10(6):3681-3693. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2019.100604. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Optimizing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: an Update on New Insights and Advancements.优化心脏再同步治疗:新见解与进展的最新情况
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2018 Jun;15(3):156-160. doi: 10.1007/s11897-018-0391-y.
5
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.心脏再同步治疗——新兴治疗方法
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Mar 6;20(3):20. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0614-2.
6
Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.慢性心力衰竭心脏再同步治疗的进展:多部位起搏综述
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017 Oct;14(5):376-383. doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0350-z.
7
Novel Pacing Strategies for Heart Failure Management.用于心力衰竭管理的新型起搏策略
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Aug;19(8):64. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0561-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study.通过多点左心室起搏改善心脏再同步治疗反应:12个月随访研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jun;12(6):1250-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
2
Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.与在任何部位进行的传统双心室起搏相比,使用左心室四极导线进行多点起搏可改善对心脏再同步治疗的急性血流动力学反应。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 May;12(5):975-81. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.034. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
3
A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy.多部位起搏实现心脏再同步治疗的综述。
Europace. 2015 Jan;17(1):7-17. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu197. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
4
Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.在单个冠状窦分支中进行多点左心室起搏可改善心脏再同步治疗的中期超声心动图表现及临床反应。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/jce.12513. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
Improvement in acute contractility and hemodynamics with multipoint pacing via a left ventricular quadripolar pacing lead.通过左心室四极起搏导线进行多点起搏可改善急性收缩力和血流动力学。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;40(1):75-80. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9891-1. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
6
A comparison of left ventricular endocardial, multisite, and multipolar epicardial cardiac resynchronization: an acute haemodynamic and electroanatomical study.左心室心内膜、多点和多极心外膜心脏再同步比较:一项急性血液动力学和电解剖研究。
Europace. 2014 Jun;16(6):873-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut420. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
7
Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.在心脏再同步治疗患者中,多点左心室起搏可改善通过压力-容积环评估的急性血流动力学反应。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Mar;11(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.023. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
8
Acute effects of multisite left ventricular pacing on mechanical dyssynchrony in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.多部位左心室起搏对接受心脏再同步治疗患者机械不同步的急性影响。
J Card Fail. 2013 Nov;19(11):731-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
9
ACCF/HRS/AHA/ASE/HFSA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2013 appropriate use criteria for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, Heart Rhythm Society, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Failure Society of America, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.ACCF/HRS/AHA/ASE/HFSA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2013年植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗的合理使用标准:美国心脏病学基金会合理使用标准工作组、心律协会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国心力衰竭学会、心血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会以及心血管磁共振学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 26;61(12):1318-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
10
Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead.多部位起搏和双心室起搏与四极左心室导线的急性血液动力学比较。
Europace. 2013 Jul;15(7):984-91. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus435. Epub 2013 Feb 27.