• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多点起搏治疗评估心脏再同步治疗的安全性和有效性的随机临床试验的原理和设计:多点起搏(MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II)的更多反应。

Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II).

机构信息

Université de Rennes I, CICIT 804, Rennes, CHU Pontchaillou Rennes, France.

University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2019 Mar;209:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.004
PMID:30616009
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in most heart failure patients, up to 40% do not respond to CRT. Data from the MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) IDE trial and MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE I study suggest improved response in subjects in the MPP arm-programmed with wide left ventricular (LV) electrode anatomical separation (≥30 mm) and shortest timing delays of 5 milliseconds (MPP-AS)-compared with quadripolar biventricular (BiV) pacing.

STUDY DESIGN

The MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to assess the 6-month impact of MPP programmed to mandated MPP-AS settings in subjects who do not respond to 6 months of BiV pacing (MPP OFF). Approximately 5,000 subjects with a standard CRT indication will be enrolled and implanted with a quadripolar CRT system (Abbott) capable of delivering MPP. Only BiV pacing is activated at implant. At 6 months, subjects classified as CRT nonresponders (<15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume) are randomized (1:1) to MPP or continued BiV pacing. The mandated MPP parameters (eg, MPP-AS) are programmed to subjects randomized to the MPP arm. At 12 months, the 2 groups will be compared to determine if there is a difference in CRT response rate.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial will evaluate whether MPP programmed to mandated MPP-AS settings improves LV reverse remodeling and clinical response to CRT in patients who fail to respond to 6 months of BiV pacing (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02006069).

摘要

背景

尽管心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对大多数心力衰竭患者有益,但多达 40%的患者对此无反应。MultiPoint Pacing(MPP)IDE 试验和 MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE I 研究的数据表明,与双心室(BiV)起搏的四极起搏相比,在 MPP 臂中程控具有较宽的左心室(LV)电极解剖分离(≥30mm)和最短的 5 毫秒定时延迟(MPP-AS)的受试者中,应答改善。

研究设计

MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II 试验是一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究,旨在评估在对 6 个月 BiV 起搏无反应的患者(MPP OFF)中,程控为强制性 MPP-AS 设置的 MPP 的 6 个月影响。大约 5000 名具有标准 CRT 适应证的患者将被纳入并植入具有 MPP 能力的四极 CRT 系统(雅培)。植入时仅激活 BiV 起搏。在 6 个月时,将 CRT 无反应者(LV 收缩末期容积减少<15%)分类为随机(1:1)接受 MPP 或继续 BiV 起搏。强制性 MPP 参数(例如,MPP-AS)将被程控为随机分配到 MPP 臂的患者。在 12 个月时,将比较这两组以确定 CRT 反应率是否存在差异。

结论

该试验将评估在对 6 个月 BiV 起搏无反应的患者中,程控为强制性 MPP-AS 设置的 MPP 是否改善 LV 逆重构和 CRT 的临床反应(www.clinicaltrials.gov 标识符 NCT02006069)。

相似文献

1
Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II).多点起搏治疗评估心脏再同步治疗的安全性和有效性的随机临床试验的原理和设计:多点起搏(MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II)的更多反应。
Am Heart J. 2019 Mar;209:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
2
Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I.多点起搏(MORE-CRT MPP)研究中对心脏再同步治疗无反应者向有反应者转换率:I 期研究结果。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Sep 14;40(35):2979-2987. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz109.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial.多点起搏在心脏再同步治疗中的安全性和有效性:多点起搏试验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 26;3(13):1510-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing.多点左心室起搏与大解剖分离可改善对常规双心室起搏有反应和无反应者的逆向重构和对心脏再同步治疗的反应。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Feb;109(2):183-193. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01499-7. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Rationale and design of a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The MPP Trial.评估多点起搏(MPP)在心脏再同步治疗中的安全性和有效性的随机试验的原理与设计:MPP试验
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017 Nov;22(6). doi: 10.1111/anec.12448. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.在单个冠状窦分支中进行多点左心室起搏可改善心脏再同步治疗的中期超声心动图表现及临床反应。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/jce.12513. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
7
Long-term reverse remodeling and clinical improvement by MultiPoint Pacing in a randomized, international, Middle Eastern heart failure study.多部位起搏在一项随机、国际性、中东心力衰竭研究中的长期逆向重构和临床改善。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;63(2):399-407. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00928-2. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by multipoint pacing improves response of left ventricular mechanics and fluid dynamics: a three-dimensional and particle image velocimetry echo study.多点起搏心脏再同步治疗改善左心室力学和流体动力学反应:三维和粒子图像测速超声研究。
Europace. 2017 Nov 1;19(11):1833-1840. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw331.
9
Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.多点左心室起搏可改善心脏再同步治疗的反应,无论是否进行压力-容积环优化:两种不同程控策略的长期疗效比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;54(2):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0480-6. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
Impact of Left Ventricular vs Biventricular Pacing on Reverse Remodelling: Insights From the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH) Trial.左心室与双心室起搏对逆向重构影响的比较:心力衰竭再同步治疗评估研究(EARTH 试验)的相关见解。
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;33(10):1274-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.07.478. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing as Alternative Approach in Cases of Biventricular Pacing Failure.多点左心室起搏作为双心室起搏失败病例的替代方法。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 7;14(4):1065. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041065.
2
Multipoint pacing is associated with improved prognosis and cardiac resynchronization therapy response: MORE-CRT MPP randomized study secondary analyses.多点起搏与改善预后和心脏再同步治疗反应相关:MORE-CRT MPP 随机研究的二次分析。
Europace. 2024 Nov 1;26(11). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae259.
3
Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the MORE-CRT MPP trial.
MORE-CRT MPP 试验中心力再同步治疗无反应者到有反应者的转化率。
Europace. 2023 Oct 5;25(10). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad294.
4
Determinants of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.心脏再同步治疗反应的决定因素
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022 May 15;13(5):4994-5003. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2022.130503. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with multipoint pacing via quadripolar lead versus traditional biventricular pacing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies on hemodynamic, clinical, and prognostic parameters.经四极导线多点起搏的心脏再同步治疗与传统双心室起搏:关于血流动力学、临床及预后参数的临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Heart Rhythm O2. 2021 Dec 17;2(6Part B):682-690. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.09.012. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
"Is multipoint pacing superior to optimized single-point pacing?"-Authors' reply.“多点起搏是否优于优化的单点起搏?”——作者回复
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;32(12):3280-3281. doi: 10.1111/jce.15276. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
7
Multipoint pacing for cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.多点起搏用于心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;32(9):2577-2589. doi: 10.1111/jce.15199. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Left ventricle pacing challenges in cardiac resynchronization therapy systems.心脏再同步治疗系统中的左心室起搏挑战
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021 Jul-Aug;21(4):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
9
Real-world outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: design and baseline demographics of the SMART- Registry.心脏再同步治疗患者的真实世界结局:SMART注册研究的设计与基线人口统计学特征
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1675-1680. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13192. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
10
Cardiac Electronic Devices: Future Directions and Challenges.心脏电子设备:未来方向与挑战
Med Devices (Auckl). 2020 Sep 25;13:325-338. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S245625. eCollection 2020.