Ozturk N, Armato S, Giger M L, Serago C, Ross L F
The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part3):3623-3624. doi: 10.1118/1.4734712.
To perform a needs assessment survey of ethics/professionalism education in medical physics and ethical/professional challenges in clinical,research and educational settings with the intent of supplementing and customizing TG159 recommended ethics curriculum for medical physics trainees.
A web-based survey was conducted among AAPM members to assess current practices, attitudes and perceptions pertaining to ethics/professionalism education and ethical/professional misconduct or questionable behavior and practices in the field.
The survey was distributed by AAPM to 7708 members via email; 1362 (17.7%) responded. Seventy-five percent of the respondents were male. Sixty percent (805/1345) stated they received no education in ethics/professionalism. Eighty-one percent (126/155) of current trainees received instruction in ethics/professionalism, as opposed to 35% (392/1130) of those who are post-training. There was strong support (>90%) for continuing education in ethics/professionalism; seventy-five percent (1019/1354) supported sessions on ethics and professionalism at national meetings. Most preferred method of ethics instruction was periodic discussion sessions involving faculty and trainees, with the least interest expressed for a separate course. Many reported direct personal knowledge of one or more instances of a variety of professional/ethical misconduct or questionable behavior. Thirty eight percent (458/1192) reported poor mentorship, with women reporting this concern more often than men (129/281,46% versus 316/877, 36%, p<.05). Over one-fourth of respondents reported being asked to perform low educational value tasks and expressed concerns about fairness. A significant minority also reported questionable behavior with respect to authorship assignment (346/920, 38%), data fabrication (107/924, 12%), data falsification (94/919, 10%); concerns about research subject privacy and confidentiality were lower (64/887, 7%).
Data gathered through the survey is guiding our efforts to develop a case-based ethics curriculum and instructional materials for medical physics trainees at our institution. This effort may be useful to other medical physics programs which offer ethics training/education. This work has been funded in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, T32 EB002103-22S1.
开展一项关于医学物理领域伦理/职业素养教育以及临床、研究和教育环境中伦理/职业挑战的需求评估调查,旨在补充并定制适合医学物理学员的TG159推荐伦理课程。
对美国医学物理学会(AAPM)会员进行了一项基于网络的调查,以评估与伦理/职业素养教育以及该领域的伦理/职业不当行为或可疑行为及做法相关的当前实践、态度和认知。
AAPM通过电子邮件向7708名会员发放了调查问卷;1362人(17.7%)回复。75%的受访者为男性。60%(805/1345)表示他们未接受过伦理/职业素养方面的教育。81%(126/155)的当前学员接受过伦理/职业素养方面的指导,而培训后人员中这一比例为35%(392/1130)。对于伦理/职业素养方面的继续教育有强烈支持(>90%);75%(1019/1354)的人支持在全国会议上举办伦理和职业素养方面的会议。最受欢迎的伦理教学方法是由教员和学员参与的定期讨论会,对单独开设一门课程的兴趣最低。许多人报告直接了解到各种职业/伦理不当行为或可疑行为的一个或多个实例。38%(458/1192)的人报告导师指导不佳,女性报告这一问题的频率高于男性(129/281,46%对316/877,36%,p<0.05)。超过四分之一的受访者报告曾被要求执行低教育价值的任务,并对公平性表示担忧。也有相当少数人报告在作者署名(346/920,38%)、数据编造(107/924,12%)、数据伪造(94/919,10%)方面存在可疑行为;对研究对象隐私和保密的担忧较低(64/887,7%)。
通过调查收集的数据正在指导我们为我校医学物理学员开发基于案例的伦理课程和教学材料的工作。这一努力可能对其他提供伦理培训/教育的医学物理项目有用。这项工作部分得到了美国国立卫生研究院(National Institutes of Health)授予的T32 EB002103 - 22S1资助。