Hart Tessa, Brockway Jo Ann, Maiuro Roland D, Vaccaro Monica, Fann Jesse R, Mellick David, Harrison-Felix Cindy, Barber Jason, Temkin Nancy
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania (Dr Hart and Ms Vaccaro); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Dr Brockway), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Dr Fann), Department of Neurological Surgery (Mr Barber), and Departments of Neurological Surgery and Biostatistics (Dr Temkin), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Dr Maiuro); and Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colorado (Mr Mellick and Dr Harrison-Felix).
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017 Sep/Oct;32(5):319-331. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000316.
To test efficacy of 8-session, 1:1 treatment, anger self-management training (ASMT), for chronic moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Three US outpatient treatment facilities.
Ninety people with TBI and elevated self-reported anger; 76 significant others (SOs) provided collateral data.
Multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2:1 randomization to ASMT or structurally equivalent comparison treatment, personal readjustment and education (PRE). Primary outcome assessment 1 week posttreatment; 8-week follow-up.
Response to treatment defined as 1 or more standard deviation change in self-reported anger.
SO-rated anger, emotional and behavioral status, satisfaction with life, timing of treatment response, participant and SO-rated global change, and treatment satisfaction.
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-Revised Trait Anger (TA) and Anger Expression-Out (AX-O) subscales; Brief Anger-Aggression Questionnaire (BAAQ); Likert-type ratings of treatment satisfaction, global changes in anger and well-being.
After treatment, ASMT response rate (68%) exceeded that of PRE (47%) on TA but not AX-O or BAAQ; this finding persisted at 8-week follow-up. No significant between-group differences in SO-reported response rates, emotional/behavioral status, or life satisfaction. ASMT participants were more satisfied with treatment and rated global change in anger as significantly better; SO ratings of global change in both anger and well-being were superior for ASMT.
ASMT was efficacious and persistent for some aspects of problematic anger. More research is needed to determine optimal dose and essential ingredients of behavioral treatment for anger after TBI.
测试为期8节、一对一的愤怒自我管理训练(ASMT)对慢性中度至重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的疗效。
美国的三个门诊治疗机构。
90名有TBI且自我报告愤怒情绪升高的人;76名重要他人(SO)提供了旁证数据。
多中心随机对照试验,以2:1的比例随机分配到ASMT或结构等效的对照治疗,即个人重新调整与教育(PRE)。治疗后1周进行主要结局评估;8周随访。
对治疗的反应定义为自我报告的愤怒情绪有1个或更多标准差的变化。
SO评定的愤怒情绪、情绪和行为状态、生活满意度、治疗反应的时间、参与者和SO评定的总体变化以及治疗满意度。
状态-特质愤怒表达量表修订版的特质愤怒(TA)和愤怒表达-外向(AX-O)分量表;简短愤怒-攻击问卷(BAAQ);治疗满意度、愤怒和幸福感总体变化的李克特式评分。
治疗后,ASMT在TA量表上的反应率(68%)超过了PRE(47%),但在AX-O或BAAQ量表上没有;这一发现在8周随访时持续存在。在SO报告的反应率、情绪/行为状态或生活满意度方面,两组之间没有显著差异。ASMT参与者对治疗更满意,并且评定愤怒的总体变化明显更好;ASMT在愤怒和幸福感方面的总体变化的SO评定也更优。
ASMT对问题性愤怒的某些方面有效且具有持续性。需要更多研究来确定TBI后愤怒行为治疗的最佳剂量和关键要素。