Predictors of Treatment Response to a Psychoeducational Intervention for Anger in Chronic Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE

The investigators examined predictors of treatment response to anger self-management training (ASMT) among patients with chronic moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

A multicenter randomized clinical trial comprising 90 participants with moderate-severe TBI was conducted. Fifty-four participants who were randomly assigned to receive active treatment and provided complete data were included in the current secondary analysis. Model averaging was used to examine the relative importance and significance of pretreatment variables for predicting change during treatment. Dependent variables were pre- to posttreatment changes in trait anger (TA) and anger expression-out (AX-O) subscale scores of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-Revised. Predictors included demographic, injury-related, and neuropsychological variables, including both objective and self-reported measures of executive function, as well as readiness to change and participation of a significant other in treatment.

RESULTS

Change in both dependent variables was predicted by higher baseline anger. Greater change in TA was additionally predicted by White race, higher education, shorter posttraumatic amnesia, and worse self-reported (but not objectively measured) executive dysfunction; the latter predictor may have indicated better self-awareness. Greater change in AX-O was additionally predicted by better episodic memory and, paradoxically, lower readiness to change.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research should focus on adapting psychoeducational anger treatments to better serve the diverse populations affected by moderate-severe TBI. These findings suggest that providing memory aids to support the use of learned strategies after treatment cessation would be beneficial. Further research should also examine the construct of readiness to change and specific aspects of executive function that may affect treatment response in psychoeducational treatments. These findings were derived from only one model of anger intervention, and the relevance to other treatment approaches cannot be assumed.