• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Monitored Anesthesia Care in Sialendoscopy.唾液腺内镜检查中监护麻醉护理的评估
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Aug 1;143(8):769-774. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0181.
2
Comparison of general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care for sialendoscopy procedures.唾液腺内镜手术中全身麻醉与监护麻醉的比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan-Feb;42(1):102809. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102809. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
3
Patient experiences of sialendoscopy with monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia.患者接受监控麻醉下涎腺内镜检查与全身麻醉的体验。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Jul-Aug;43(4):103483. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103483. Epub 2022 May 4.
4
Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Sialendoscopy for Sialolithiasis.超声检查和计算机断层扫描在涎石病唾液腺内镜检查患者评估中的准确性
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May;156(5):834-839. doi: 10.1177/0194599817696308. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
Nuances and Management of Hilar Submandibular Sialoliths With Combined Transoral Robotic Surgery-Assisted Sialolithotomy and Sialendoscopy.舌下腺门部涎石的细微差别及处理——经口机器人辅助涎石切开术联合涎腺内镜治疗
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jul;165(1):76-82. doi: 10.1177/0194599820973231. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
6
Prognostic factors for therapeutic sialendoscopy.治疗性唾液腺内镜检查的预后因素
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Mar;132(3):275-278. doi: 10.1017/S0022215117000822. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Retrograde sialendoscopy: a new technique for avoiding retained ductal stones.逆行涎腺内镜检查术:一种避免导管结石残留的新技术。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 Jan;121(1):38-43. doi: 10.1177/000348941212100107.
8
Pediatric salivary gland obstructive swelling: sialendoscopic approach.小儿唾液腺阻塞性肿胀:唾液腺内镜治疗方法
Laryngoscope. 2007 Aug;117(8):1364-7. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318068657c.
9
Treatment outcomes of sialendoscopy for submandibular gland sialolithiasis.涎腺镜治疗下颌下腺涎石病的疗效观察。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2023 Oct;50(5):783-789. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
10
Endoscopic sialolith removal: orientation and shape as predictors of success.内镜下涎石取出术:方向和形状作为成功的预测因素
Am J Otolaryngol. 2009 May-Jun;30(3):153-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic and Interventional Sialendoscopy: A Four-Year Retrospective Study of 89 Patients.诊断性与介入性涎腺内镜检查:89例患者的四年回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):3938. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113938.
2
Minimally Invasive Interventions in Obstructive and Inflammatory Salivary Gland Diseases: Local Anesthesia Based Pain Management, Stratification of Invasiveness, and Patients' Perceptions.阻塞性和炎性唾液腺疾病的微创干预:基于局部麻醉的疼痛管理、侵入性分层及患者认知
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 7;14(6):1797. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061797.

本文引用的文献

1
Is sialendoscopy an effective treatment for obstructive salivary gland disease?唾液腺内镜检查术是治疗阻塞性唾液腺疾病的有效方法吗?
Laryngoscope. 2013 Aug;123(8):1828-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.23958. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
2
Etiologic factors in sialolithiasis.涎石病的病因。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Dec;145(6):935-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599811415489. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
3
Sialoendoscopy in the diagnosis and management of obstructive sialadenitis.涎腺内镜在阻塞性涎腺炎的诊断和治疗中的应用。
Laryngoscope. 2011 Mar;121(3):495-500. doi: 10.1002/lary.21378. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
4
[Endoscopic management of sialolithiasis (a practical experience in 52 cases)].[涎石病的内镜治疗(52例实践经验)]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Apr;43(4):248-9.
5
[Sialendoscopy of the salivary glands].[唾液腺的唾液腺内镜检查]
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2008 Jun;109(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.stomax.2008.04.003. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
6
Interventional sialoendoscopy: early clinical results.介入性唾液腺内镜检查:早期临床结果
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 May;66(5):954-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.017.
7
Selective management of obstructive submandibular sialadenitis.阻塞性下颌下腺涎腺炎的选择性管理
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jan;46(1):46-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.06.008. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
8
Sialoendoscopy: A new approach to salivary gland obstructive pathology.唾液腺内镜检查:唾液腺阻塞性病变的一种新方法。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Oct;137(10):1394-400. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0051.
9
Glandular function after intraoral removal of salivary calculi from the hilum of the submandibular gland.经口从下颌下腺门部摘除涎石后的腺功能
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Dec;42(6):538-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.08.006.
10
Endoscopy: a minimally invasive procedure for diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the salivary glands. Six years of practical experience.内镜检查:一种用于唾液腺疾病诊断和治疗的微创手术。六年实践经验。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Feb;42(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(03)00188-8.

唾液腺内镜检查中监护麻醉护理的评估

Evaluation of Monitored Anesthesia Care in Sialendoscopy.

作者信息

Trujillo Oscar, Drusin Madeleine A, Pagano Parwane P, Askin Gulce, Rahmati Rahmatullah

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Aug 1;143(8):769-774. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0181.

DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0181
PMID:28520832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5710559/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

In the United States, sialendoscopy is most often performed under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation (GETA); however, monitored anesthesia care (MAC) may be a viable alternative.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate patient characteristics and outcomes following sialendoscopy performed under MAC or GETA to assess the potential of MAC as an alternative anesthetic option.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review of medical records on patients who underwent sialendoscopy between October 1, 2011, and August 31, 2014, was performed. Patient characteristics, salivary stone characteristics, intraoperative findings, operative time (OT), anesthesia time (AT), and outcomes were evaluated. Data analysis was performed from November 1, 2015, to March 1, 2016.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Operative and anesthetic times for sialendoscopy under MAC and GETA.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients underwent 70 sialendoscopy procedures: 27 performed under MAC, 43 under GETA. Overall, 37 of 65 (56.9%) patients were women, with 17 (63.0%) in the MAC group and 20 (52.6%) in the GETA group. Mean (SD) patient age was 49.4 (17.3) and 47.2 (16.2) years for the MAC and GETA cohorts, respectively. Median (25th-75th quartiles) OT in minutes for MAC cases was significant for no stones (49.0 [31.0-49.0]) and stones (41.0 [28.0-92.0]) present; nonsignificant findings were stones in the Wharton (46.0 [28.0-92.0]) and Stenson (37.0; 1 case) ducts. For GETA cases, significance was also demonstrated for no stones (55.0 [52.0-91.0]) and stones (77.0 [56.0-107.0]) present; nonsignificant findings were stones in the Wharton (79.0 [56.0-107.0]) and Stenson (65.0 [49.0-98.0]) ducts. The AT in minutes for MAC cases was significant for no stones (33.0 [30.0-39.0]) and stones (38.0 [32.0-55.0]) present; nonsignificant findings were stones in the Wharton (60.0 [32.0-55.0]) and Stenson (37.0; 1 case) ducts. For GETA cases, findings were also significant for no stones (61.0 [52.0-67.0]) and stones (59.0 [53.0-67.0]) present; nonsignificant findings were stones in the Wharton (60.0 [54.0-69.0]) and Stenson (52.0 [48.0-61.0]) ducts.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that sialendoscopy under MAC has faster median OT and AT, regardless of varying case circumstances, such as the presence or lack of stones, successful stone removal, stone size (>5 mm), stone location, and sialendoscopy-assisted open procedures. Sialendoscopy under MAC may be a reasonable anesthetic alternative to GETA in an appropriate setting with an experienced surgeon, experienced anesthesiologist comfortable with administering MAC, cases with small (<4-mm) singular stones, and patients comfortable with undergoing the procedure without GETA.

摘要

重要性

在美国,唾液腺内镜检查大多在全身麻醉下进行气管插管(GETA);然而,监护麻醉(MAC)可能是一种可行的替代方案。

目的

研究在MAC或GETA下进行唾液腺内镜检查后的患者特征和结果,以评估MAC作为替代麻醉选择的潜力。

设计、背景和参与者:对2011年10月1日至2014年8月31日期间接受唾液腺内镜检查的患者的病历进行回顾性分析。评估患者特征、涎石特征、术中发现、手术时间(OT)、麻醉时间(AT)和结果。数据分析于2015年11月1日至2016年3月1日进行。

主要结局和指标

MAC和GETA下唾液腺内镜检查的手术和麻醉时间。

结果

65例患者接受了70次唾液腺内镜检查:27例在MAC下进行,43例在GETA下进行。总体而言,65例患者中有37例(56.9%)为女性,MAC组17例(63.0%),GETA组20例(52.6%)。MAC组和GETA组患者的平均(标准差)年龄分别为49.4(17.3)岁和47.2(16.2)岁。MAC病例中,无结石(49.0[31.0 - 49.0])和有结石(41.0[28.0 - 92.0])时的手术时间中位数(第25 - 75四分位数)分钟有显著差异;沃顿管(46.0[28.0 - 92.0])和斯滕森管(37.0;1例)有结石时差异不显著。GETA病例中,无结石(55.0[52.0 - 91.0])和有结石(77.0[56.0 - 107.0])时也有显著差异;沃顿管(79.0[56.0 - 107.0])和斯滕森管(65.0[49.0 - 98.0])有结石时差异不显著。MAC病例中,无结石(33.0[30.0 - 39.0])和有结石(38.0[32.0 - 55.0])时的麻醉时间分钟有显著差异;沃顿管(60.0[32.0 - 55.0])和斯滕森管(37.0;1例)有结石时差异不显著。GETA病例中,无结石(61.0[52.0 - 67.0])和有结石(59.0[53.0 - 67.0])时也有显著差异;沃顿管(60.0[54.0 - 69.0])和斯滕森管(52.0[48.0 - 61.0])有结石时差异不显著。

结论和相关性

本研究表明,无论病例情况如何变化,如有无结石、结石清除是否成功、结石大小(>5mm)、结石位置以及唾液腺内镜辅助开放手术等,MAC下的唾液腺内镜检查手术时间和麻醉时间中位数更快。在有经验的外科医生、熟悉MAC管理的经验丰富的麻醉医生、结石较小(<4mm)且为单个结石的病例以及愿意在无GETA情况下接受手术的患者等合适的情况下,MAC下的唾液腺内镜检查可能是GETA的合理麻醉替代方案。