Suppr超能文献

在达到万古霉素谷浓度目标时的异速生长与共识性指南给药法

Allometric versus consensus guideline dosing in achieving target vancomycin trough concentrations.

作者信息

Brown Matthew L, Hutchison Amber M, McAtee Aaron M, Gaillard Philippe R, Childress Darrell T

机构信息

Princeton Baptist Medical Center, Birmingham, AL

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Jul 15;74(14):1067-1075. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160260. Epub 2017 May 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Results of a study comparing the performance of allometric versus consensus guideline-recommended vancomycin dosing in achieving initial trough concentrations within the desired range are reported.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to compare selected outcomes with 2 vancomycin dosing methods: (1) dosing by total body weight, as recommended in current consensus guidelines, and (2) a new empirical vancomycin dosing strategy grounded in allometry (the study of the relationship between body size and physiology). The primary outcome was attainment of an initial vancomycin trough concentration within the target range (10-20 mg/L). Rates of nephrotoxicity associated with the 2 dosing methods were compared.

RESULTS

Allometric dosing resulted in 77% of the evaluated patient sample ( = 81) achieving vancomycin trough concentration targets at the initial measurement, as compared with a target attainment rate of 57% ( = 81) with guideline-recommended dosing ( = 0.0121); the rate of target attainment in obese patients was also improved with allometric dosing (73% versus 46%, = 0.0327). Nephrotoxicity rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, but a lower rate was observed with allometric versus guideline-based dosing (1.2% versus 7.4%, = 0.0584).

CONCLUSION

In hospitalized adults, allometric vancomycin dosing achieved a higher frequency of initial vancomycin trough concentrations within the target range of 10-20 mg/L, compared with dosing as recommended by consensus guidelines. The difference between methods in the percentage of troughs within the target range was most pronounced in obese patients.

摘要

目的

报告一项比较根据体表面积计算法与共识指南推荐的万古霉素给药方案在使初始血药谷浓度达到理想范围方面的研究结果。

方法

开展一项回顾性研究,比较两种万古霉素给药方法的选定结果:(1)按照当前共识指南推荐,根据总体重给药;(2)一种基于体表面积计算法(研究体型与生理学之间关系)的新的经验性万古霉素给药策略。主要结果是初始万古霉素血药谷浓度达到目标范围(10 - 20mg/L)。比较两种给药方法相关的肾毒性发生率。

结果

根据体表面积计算法给药的患者样本(n = 81)中有77%在首次测量时达到万古霉素血药谷浓度目标,相比之下,按照指南推荐给药的目标达成率为57%(n = 81)(P = 0.0121);根据体表面积计算法给药,肥胖患者的目标达成率也有所提高(73%对46%,P = 0.0327)。两组之间的肾毒性发生率无显著差异,但根据体表面积计算法给药的肾毒性发生率低于基于指南给药(1.2%对7.4%,P = 0.0584)。

结论

在住院成人中,与共识指南推荐的给药方法相比,根据体表面积计算法的万古霉素给药方案使初始万古霉素血药谷浓度在10 - 20mg/L目标范围内的频率更高。目标范围内血药谷浓度百分比在两种方法之间的差异在肥胖患者中最为明显。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验