Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease Etiology Research Center, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Diabet Med. 2017 Sep;34(9):1235-1243. doi: 10.1111/dme.13384. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
To compare the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality associated with sulfonylurea (SU), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) and thiazolidinedione (TZD) as add-on medications to metformin (MET) therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes.
We identified 40 263 individuals who used SU (n = 11 582), DPP4i (n = 26 623) or TZD (n = 2058) in addition to MET between January 2013 and June 2015 from the database of the Korean National Health Insurance, the single-payer healthcare system in South Korea. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for major CVD event (coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke or transient ischaemic attack) development and all-cause mortality by second-line anti-diabetes medication type. Age, sex, duration of MET monotherapy, calendar year and comorbid conditions were adjusted as potential confounders.
The observed numbers of CVD events (total observed person-time) were 485 (18 778 person-years) for MET + SU, 744 (40 374 person-years) for MET + DPP4i and 60 (3014 person-years) for MET + TZD users. Compared with MET + SU users, the fully adjusted hazard ratios for CVD events were 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.89] for MET + DPP4i users and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.65-1.11) for MET + TZD users. The corresponding hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.66-1.07) for MET + DPP4i users and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.35-1.28) for MET + TZD users.
Analysis of Korea National Health Insurance database showed that MET + DPP4i treatment for diabetes had a lower CVD risk than MET + SU treatment.
比较在 2 型糖尿病患者中,磺酰脲类(SU)、二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(DPP4i)和噻唑烷二酮(TZD)作为二甲双胍(MET)治疗的附加药物,与心血管疾病(CVD)风险和全因死亡率的相关性。
我们从韩国单一支付者医疗保健系统韩国国家健康保险数据库中,选取了 2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 6 月期间,40263 名使用 SU(n=11582)、DPP4i(n=26623)或 TZD(n=2058)联合 MET 的患者。采用 Cox 比例风险模型估计按二线抗糖尿病药物类型的主要 CVD 事件(冠心病、心力衰竭、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作)发展和全因死亡率的风险比。年龄、性别、MET 单药治疗持续时间、日历年度和合并症作为潜在混杂因素进行调整。
观察到的 CVD 事件数(总观察人年数)为 MET+SU 组 485(18778 人年)、MET+DPP4i 组 744(40374 人年)和 MET+TZD 组 60(3014 人年)。与 MET+SU 组相比,MET+DPP4i 组的 CVD 事件风险比为 0.79(95%可信区间:0.71-0.89),MET+TZD 组为 0.85(95%可信区间:0.65-1.11)。全因死亡率的相应风险比为 MET+DPP4i 组 0.84(95%可信区间:0.66-1.07),MET+TZD 组 0.67(95%可信区间:0.35-1.28)。
韩国国家健康保险数据库的分析显示,与 MET+SU 治疗相比,MET+DPP4i 治疗糖尿病的 CVD 风险较低。