Ha Kyoung Hwa, Kim Bongseong, Shin Hae Sol, Lee Jinhee, Choi Hansol, Kim Hyeon Chang, Kim Dae Jung
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease Etiology Research Center, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Korean Circ J. 2018 May;48(5):395-405. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0324. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
To compare cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk associated with 5 different dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) in people with type 2 diabetes.
We identified 534,327 people who were newly prescribed sitagliptin (n=167,157), vildagliptin (n=67,412), saxagliptin (n=29,479), linagliptin (n=220,672), or gemigliptin (n=49,607) between January 2013 and June 2015 using the claims database of the Korean National Health Insurance System. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for major CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or death) among users of different DPP-4is. The model was adjusted for sex, age, duration of DPP-4i use, use of other glucose-lowering drugs, use of antiplatelet agents, hypertension, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, microvascular complications of diabetes, Charlson comorbidity index, and the calendar index year as potential confounders.
Compared to sitagliptin users, the fully adjusted HRs for CVD events were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.01; p=0.163) for vildagliptin, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.81; p<0.001) for saxagliptin, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98; p<0.001) for linagliptin, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.88; p<0.001) for gemigliptin.
Compared to sitagliptin therapy, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and gemigliptin therapies were all associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events.
比较2型糖尿病患者中5种不同的二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)相关的心血管疾病(CVD)风险。
我们利用韩国国民健康保险系统的理赔数据库,确定了2013年1月至2015年6月期间新开具西他列汀(n = 167,157)、维格列汀(n = 67,412)、沙格列汀(n = 29,479)、利格列汀(n = 220,672)或吉格列汀(n = 49,607)处方的534,327人。采用Cox比例风险模型估计不同DPP-4i使用者发生主要CVD事件(心肌梗死、中风或死亡)的风险比(HR)。该模型针对性别、年龄、DPP-4i使用时长、其他降糖药物的使用、抗血小板药物的使用、高血压、血脂异常、心房颤动、慢性肾脏病、糖尿病微血管并发症、Charlson合并症指数以及日历年份指数作为潜在混杂因素进行了调整。
与西他列汀使用者相比,维格列汀CVD事件的完全调整后HR为0.97(95%置信区间[CI],0.94 - 1.01;p = 0.163),沙格列汀为0.76(95% CI,0.71 - 0.81;p < 0.001),利格列汀为0.95(95% CI,0.92 - 0.98;p < 0.001),吉格列汀为0.84(95% CI,0.80 - 0.88;p < 0.001)。
与西他列汀治疗相比,沙格列汀、利格列汀和吉格列汀治疗均与较低的心血管事件风险相关。