Lachová V, Škorvanová L, Svetlíková D, Turianová L, Kostrábová A, Betáková T
Acta Virol. 2017;61(2):183-190. doi: 10.4149/av_2017_02_07.
Type I and type III interferons (IFNs) are induced by viral infection. It was concluded that these IFN species are identical in regulation and biological functions. However, these two systems differ in the tissue expression of their receptors and their transcriptional regulation is fundamentally different as well as cellular signaling pathways that drive expression of each IFN. Here, we have investigated the transcriptional profile of endogenous IFNs after stimulation of cells with exogenous IFNs and subsequent infection of A549 cells with A/chicken/Germany/27 [H7N7] influenza virus. Both type I and type III IFNs exhibit high degree of the cross-induction. Our results show that type III IFNs (IFN-λ1, IFN-λ2 and IFN-λ3) are better inducers of CXCL10 than type I IFNs. The IFN-β1a and IFN-λ2 were the most potent IFNs and they highly increased the level of IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-λ, and CXCL10 mRNAs. Since type I IFNs up regulated expression of retinoic acid-inducible gene 1 (RIG-1) mRNA, type III IFNs-λ down regulated expression of RIG-1 mRNA in influenza infected cells. IFN-α and IFN-ω induced similar amount of IFN-α, IFN-β and IFN-λ mRNA but differ in induction of CXCL10 and RIG-1 mRNA.
I型和III型干扰素(IFN)由病毒感染诱导产生。得出的结论是,这些干扰素种类在调节和生物学功能上是相同的。然而,这两个系统在其受体的组织表达方面存在差异,并且它们的转录调节以及驱动每种干扰素表达的细胞信号通路也存在根本差异。在这里,我们研究了用外源性干扰素刺激细胞并随后用A/鸡/德国/27 [H7N7]流感病毒感染A549细胞后内源性干扰素的转录谱。I型和III型干扰素均表现出高度的交叉诱导作用。我们的结果表明,III型干扰素(IFN-λ1、IFN-λ2和IFN-λ3)比I型干扰素更能诱导CXCL10的产生。IFN-β1a和IFN-λ2是最有效的干扰素,它们显著提高了IFN-α、IFN-β、IFN-λ和CXCL10 mRNA的水平。由于I型干扰素上调视黄酸诱导基因1(RIG-1)mRNA的表达,而III型干扰素-λ在流感感染的细胞中下调RIG-1 mRNA的表达。IFN-α和IFN-ω诱导的IFN-α、IFN-β和IFN-λ mRNA量相似,但在诱导CXCL10和RIG-1 mRNA方面存在差异。