Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):732-742. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30312-1. Epub 2017 May 16.
The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine is indicated for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. Approval of this drug was based on progression-free survival and interim overall survival data from the phase 3 EMILIA study. In this report, we present a descriptive analysis of the final overall survival data from that trial.
EMILIA was a randomised, international, open-label, phase 3 study of men and women aged 18 years or older with HER2-positive unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a hierarchical, dynamic randomisation scheme and an interactive voice response system to trastuzumab emtansine (3·6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks) or control (capecitabine 1000 mg/m self-administered orally twice daily on days 1-14 on each 21-day cycle, plus lapatinib 1250 mg orally once daily on days 1-21). Randomisation was stratified by world region (USA vs western Europe vs or other), number of previous chemotherapy regimens for unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic disease (0 or 1 vs >1), and disease involvement (visceral vs non-visceral). The coprimary efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival (per independent review committee assessment) and overall survival. Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat population; safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, with patients analysed according to the treatment actually received. On May 30, 2012, the study protocol was amended to allow crossover from control to trastuzumab emtansine after the second interim overall survival analysis crossed the prespecified overall survival efficacy boundary. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00829166.
Between Feb 23, 2009, and Oct 13, 2011, 991 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either trastuzumab emtansine (n=495) or capecitabine and lapatinib (control; n=496). In this final descriptive analysis, median overall survival was longer with trastuzumab emtansine than with control (29·9 months [95% CI 26·3-34·1] vs 25·9 months [95% CI 22·7-28·3]; hazard ratio 0·75 [95% CI 0·64-0·88]). 136 (27%) of 496 patients crossed over from control to trastuzumab emtansine after the second interim overall survival analysis (median follow-up duration 24·1 months [IQR 19·5-26·1]). Of those patients originally randomly assigned to trastuzumab emtansine, 254 (51%) of 495 received capecitabine and 241 [49%] of 495 received lapatinib (separately or in combination) after study drug discontinuation. In the safety population (488 patients treated with capecitabine plus lapatinib, 490 patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine), fewer grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred with trastuzumab emtansine (233 [48%] of 490) than with capecitabine plus lapatinib control treatment (291 [60%] of 488). In the control group, the most frequently reported grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhoea (103 [21%] of 488 patients) followed by palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (87 [18%]), and vomiting (24 [5%]). The safety profile of trastuzumab emtansine was similar to that reported previously; the most frequently reported grade 3 or worse adverse events in the trastuzumab emtansine group were thrombocytopenia (70 [14%] of 490), increased aspartate aminotransferase levels (22 [5%]), and anaemia (19 [4%]). Nine patients died from adverse events; five of these deaths were judged to be related to treatment (two in the control group [coronary artery disease and multiorgan failure] and three in the trastuzumab emtansine group [metabolic encephalopathy, neutropenic sepsis, and acute myeloid leukaemia]).
This descriptive analysis of final overall survival in the EMILIA trial shows that trastuzumab emtansine improved overall survival in patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer even in the presence of crossover treatment. The safety profile was similar to that reported in previous analyses, reaffirming trastuzumab emtansine as an efficacious and tolerable treatment in this patient population.
F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech.
曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物(trastuzumab emtansine)用于治疗先前接受曲妥珠单抗和紫杉烷治疗的 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌患者。该药的批准基于 III 期 EMILIA 研究的无进展生存期和中期总生存期数据。在本报告中,我们报告了该试验最终总生存期数据的描述性分析。
EMILIA 是一项随机、国际、开放标签、III 期研究,纳入年龄为 18 岁及以上的 HER2 阳性、不可切除、局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者,这些患者先前接受过曲妥珠单抗和紫杉烷治疗。入组患者通过分层、动态随机分组方案和交互式语音应答系统按 1:1 比例随机分配至曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物(3.6mg/kg 静脉输注,每 3 周 1 次)或对照组(卡培他滨 1000mg/m2 口服,每日 2 次,第 1-14 天,每 21 天周期,加用拉帕替尼 1250mg 口服,每日 1 次,第 1-21 天)。随机分组按世界区域(美国 vs 西欧 vs 其他)、先前治疗不可切除、局部晚期或转移性疾病的化疗方案数量(0 或 1 个 vs >1 个)和疾病累及情况(内脏 vs 非内脏)分层。主要疗效终点为无进展生存期(独立评审委员会评估)和总生存期。在意向治疗人群中进行疗效分析;根据实际接受的治疗,对所有接受至少一剂研究治疗的患者进行安全性分析。2012 年 5 月 30 日,研究方案修订,允许在第二次中期总生存期分析达到预设的总生存期疗效边界后,从对照组交叉至曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00829166。
2009 年 2 月 23 日至 2011 年 10 月 13 日,991 名符合条件的患者入组并随机分配至曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物(n=495)或卡培他滨和拉帕替尼(对照组;n=496)。在本次最终描述性分析中,曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物组的中位总生存期长于对照组(29.9 个月[95%CI 26.3-34.1] vs 25.9 个月[95%CI 22.7-28.3];风险比 0.75[95%CI 0.64-0.88])。第二次中期总生存期分析后,有 136(27%)名 496 名对照组患者交叉至曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物组(中位随访时间 24.1 个月[IQR 19.5-26.1])。最初随机分配至曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物组的 495 名患者中,254 名(51%)患者接受卡培他滨治疗,241 名(49%)患者接受拉帕替尼(单独或联合)治疗,随后停止研究药物治疗。在安全性人群(488 名接受卡培他滨加拉帕替尼治疗的患者,490 名接受曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物治疗的患者)中,曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物组的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件发生率低于卡培他滨加拉帕替尼对照组(490 名患者中的 233 例[48%] vs 488 名患者中的 291 例[60%])。在对照组中,报告最频繁的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件是腹泻(488 名患者中有 103 例[21%]),其次是掌跖感觉丧失综合征(87 例[18%])和呕吐(24 例[5%])。曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物的安全性与之前报告的相似;曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物组报告最频繁的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件是血小板减少症(490 名患者中有 70 例[14%])、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶水平升高(22 例[5%])和贫血(19 例[4%])。9 名患者因不良事件死亡;其中 5 例死亡被认为与治疗相关(对照组 2 例[冠心病和多器官衰竭],曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物组 3 例[代谢性脑病、中性粒细胞败血症和急性髓系白血病])。
EMILIA 试验的最终总生存期描述性分析表明,曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物改善了先前接受过治疗的 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌患者的总生存期,即使存在交叉治疗。安全性与之前的分析结果相似,再次证实曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物在该患者人群中是一种有效且耐受良好的治疗方法。
罗氏/基因泰克。