• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑膜瘤手术中的辛普森分级:肿瘤位置会影响其预后价值吗?

The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value?

作者信息

Voß Kira Marie, Spille Dorothee Cäcilia, Sauerland Cristina, Suero Molina Eric, Brokinkel Caroline, Paulus Werner, Stummer Walter, Holling Markus, Jeibmann Astrid, Brokinkel Benjamin

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.

Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2017 Jul;133(3):641-651. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2481-1. Epub 2017 May 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11060-017-2481-1
PMID:28527009
Abstract

In meningiomas, location-specific differences of the prognostic value of the Simpson classification are sparsely investigated but can influence strategy of surgery. We therefore compared the prognostic value of the Simpson classification in different tumor locations. Progression was compared with Simpson grade in 826 meningioma patients (median age 58 years, female:male ratio 2.4) in location-specific uni- and multivariate analyses. Simpson grade strongly correlated with tumor location (p < .001). Within a median follow-up of 50 months, recurrence was observed in 107 of 803 patients (13%). In general, increasing Simpson grade (p = .002) and subtotal resection (STR, ≥grade III) were correlated with tumor recurrence [hazard ratio (HR): 1.87; p = .004]. In 268 convexity meningiomas, frequency of tumor recurrence correlated with Simpson grade (p = .034). Risk of recurrence was similar after grade I and II resections, tended to increase after grade III (HR: 2.35; p = .087) but was higher after grade IV resections (HR: 7.35; p = .003). Risk of recurrence was higher after STR (HR: 4.21; p = .001) than after gross total resection (GTR, ≤grade II). Contrarily, increasing Simpson grade and STR were not correlated with progression in 102 falx, 38 posterior fossa and nine intraventricular meningiomas. In 325 skull base lesions, risk of recurrence was similar after GTR and STR (p = .198) and was only increased after grade IV resections (HR: 3.26; p = .017). Simpson grading and extent of resection were not equally prognostic in all locations. Lower impact of extent of resection should be considered during surgery for skull base, posterior fossa and falx meningiomas.

摘要

在脑膜瘤中,辛普森分类法预后价值的部位特异性差异鲜有研究,但可能影响手术策略。因此,我们比较了辛普森分类法在不同肿瘤部位的预后价值。在部位特异性单因素和多因素分析中,我们比较了826例脑膜瘤患者(中位年龄58岁,女性与男性比例为2.4)的肿瘤进展情况与辛普森分级。辛普森分级与肿瘤部位密切相关(p < 0.001)。在中位随访50个月期间,803例患者中有107例(13%)出现复发。总体而言,辛普森分级增加(p = 0.002)和次全切除(STR,≥Ⅲ级)与肿瘤复发相关[风险比(HR):1.87;p = 0.004]。在268例凸面脑膜瘤中,肿瘤复发频率与辛普森分级相关(p = 0.034)。Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级切除术后复发风险相似,Ⅲ级切除术后复发风险有增加趋势(HR:2.35;p = 0.087),但Ⅳ级切除术后复发风险更高(HR:7.35;p = 0.003)。次全切除术后复发风险高于全切除(GTR,≤Ⅱ级)(HR:4.21;p = 0.001)。相反,在102例镰旁、38例后颅窝和9例脑室内脑膜瘤中,辛普森分级增加和次全切除与肿瘤进展无关。在325例颅底病变中,全切除和次全切除术后复发风险相似(p = 0.198),仅Ⅳ级切除术后复发风险增加(HR:3.26;p = 0.017)。辛普森分级和切除范围在所有部位的预后价值并不相同。在颅底、后颅窝和镰旁脑膜瘤手术中,应考虑切除范围的影响较小。

相似文献

1
The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value?脑膜瘤手术中的辛普森分级:肿瘤位置会影响其预后价值吗?
J Neurooncol. 2017 Jul;133(3):641-651. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2481-1. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Is the Simpson Grading System Applicable to Estimate the Risk of Tumor Progression After Microsurgery for Recurrent Intracranial Meningioma?辛普森分级系统是否适用于评估复发性颅内脑膜瘤显微手术后的肿瘤进展风险?
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e589-e597. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.215. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
3
The Simpson grading: defining the optimal threshold for gross total resection in meningioma surgery.辛普森分级:定义脑膜瘤手术全切除的最佳大体切除阈值。
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Jun;44(3):1713-1720. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01369-1. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Effect of dural detachment on long-term tumor control for meningiomas treated using Simpson grade IV resection.硬脑膜剥离对 Simpson 分级 IV 切除治疗脑膜瘤的长期肿瘤控制效果的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;119(6):1373-9. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13832. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
5
WHO grade 1 meningioma recurrence: Are location and Simpson grade still relevant?世界卫生组织1级脑膜瘤复发:位置和辛普森分级仍然相关吗?
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;141:117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
6
The Relevance of Simpson Grade Resections in Modern Neurosurgical Treatment of World Health Organization Grade I, II, and III Meningiomas.辛普森分级切除在世界卫生组织I级、II级和III级脑膜瘤现代神经外科治疗中的相关性
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e588-e593. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
7
Simpson grade: an opportunity to reassess the need for complete resection of meningiomas.辛普森分级:重新评估脑膜瘤全切必要性的契机。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Feb;156(2):383-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1923-6. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
8
Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma.Simpson 分级系统与世界卫生组织一级脑膜瘤手术后无复发生存的相关性。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):201-211. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS151842. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
9
Is Falcine Meningioma a Diffuse Disease of the Falx? Case Series and Analysis of a "Grade Zero" Resection.镰状脑膜瘤是否是镰状突的弥漫性疾病?“零级”切除的病例系列和分析。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Oct 15;87(5):900-909. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa038.
10
Impact of postoperative radiotherapy on recurrence of primary intracranial atypical meningiomas.术后放疗对原发性颅内非典型脑膜瘤复发的影响。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Jan;146(2):347-355. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03382-x. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrence of Resected Skull Base Meningiomas during Long-term Follow-up: Incidence and Predisposing Factors.长期随访期间切除的颅底脑膜瘤复发:发生率及易感因素
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024 Apr 30;86(3):245-253. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786370. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Establishment of a patient-derived 3D in vitro meningioma model in xeno-free hydrogel for clinical applications.在无动物源水凝胶中建立用于临床应用的患者来源的三维体外脑膜瘤模型。
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2025 Apr 24;13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40478-025-02008-w.
3
Management of intracranial meningioma: Outcome analysis and clinico radiological profile of 172 patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Impaired health-related quality of life in meningioma patients-a systematic review.脑膜瘤患者健康相关生活质量受损:系统评价。
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):897-907. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now250.
2
EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas.EANO 指南:脑膜瘤的诊断与治疗。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):e383-91. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30321-7. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
3
Brain Invasion in Meningiomas: Incidence and Correlations with Clinical Variables and Prognosis.脑膜瘤的脑侵犯:发生率及其与临床变量和预后的相关性
颅内脑膜瘤的治疗:172例患者的疗效分析及临床影像学特征
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Dec 13;15:464. doi: 10.25259/SNI_556_2024. eCollection 2024.
4
Orthotopic meningioma rat model exhibits morphological and immunohistochemical congruency and epigenetic concordance with benign primary patient-derived tumors.原位脑膜瘤大鼠模型在形态学、免疫组织化学及表观遗传学方面与原发性良性患者肿瘤具有一致性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83456-7.
5
Regarding "Comparative Evaluation of Lower Gadolinium Doses for MR Imaging of Meningiomas: How Low Can We Go?".关于“脑膜瘤磁共振成像较低钆剂量的比较评估:我们能低到什么程度?”
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jan 8;46(1):223. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8417.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Lower Gadolinium Doses for MR Imaging of Meningiomas: How Low Can We Go?对比评估脑膜瘤磁共振成像低剂量钆对比剂:我们能低到何种程度?
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Nov 7;45(11):1762-1768. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8375.
7
Evolving concepts in meningioma management in the era of genomics.在基因组学时代,脑膜瘤管理的概念不断发展。
Cancer. 2024 Aug 1;130(15):2586-2600. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35279. Epub 2024 May 16.
8
Acute subdural hematoma caused by hemorrhagic falx meningioma: A case report and review of the literature.出血性大脑镰脑膜瘤致急性硬膜下血肿:一例报告并文献复习
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Apr 24;19(7):2804-2811. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.03.056. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Posterior cranial fossa meningiomas: Comparison of results between patients older and younger than 70 years.后颅窝脑膜瘤:70岁及以上与70岁以下患者的结果比较。
Brain Spine. 2024 Mar 26;4:102790. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102790. eCollection 2024.
10
Simpson's Grading Scale for WHO Grade I Meningioma Resection in the Modern Neurosurgical Era: Are We Really Asking the Right Question?现代神经外科时代世界卫生组织 I 级脑膜瘤切除的辛普森分级量表:我们真的问对问题了吗?
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023 Feb 22;85(2):145-155. doi: 10.1055/a-2021-8852. eCollection 2024 Apr.
World Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;93:346-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.055. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
4
Surgery for meningioma in the elderly and long-term survival: comparison with an age- and sex-matched general population and with younger patients.老年人脑膜瘤的手术治疗与长期生存:与年龄和性别匹配的普通人群以及与年轻患者的比较。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;126(4):1201-1211. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.JNS152611. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
5
Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma.Simpson 分级系统与世界卫生组织一级脑膜瘤手术后无复发生存的相关性。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):201-211. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS151842. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
6
The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management.辛普森分级再探讨:积极手术及其在现代脑膜瘤管理中的地位。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;125(3):551-60. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.JNS15754. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
WHO grade 1 meningioma recurrence: Are location and Simpson grade still relevant?世界卫生组织1级脑膜瘤复发:位置和辛普森分级仍然相关吗?
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;141:117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
World Health Organization Grade I Convexity Meningiomas: Study on Outcomes, Complications and Recurrence Rates.世界卫生组织一级凸面脑膜瘤:结局、并发症及复发率研究
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:620-627.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.050. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
9
Is postoperative imaging mandatory after meningioma removal? Results of a prospective study.脑膜瘤切除术后影像学检查是必需的吗?一项前瞻性研究的结果
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0124534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124534. eCollection 2015.
10
Survival rates, prognostic factors and treatment of anaplastic meningiomas.间变性脑膜瘤的生存率、预后因素及治疗
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 May;22(5):828-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 28.