Suppr超能文献

用于病毒感染病理诊断的非放射性原位杂交技术的比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques for pathologic diagnosis of viral infection.

作者信息

Seyda M, Scheele T, Neumann R, Krueger G R

机构信息

Pathology Institute, University of Cologne, FRG.

出版信息

Pathol Res Pract. 1988 Dec;184(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(88)80186-9.

Abstract

We have compared the efficiency of biotinylated DNA probes and various visualization techniques with 35S-labeled DNA probes in routine paraffin sections from the pathology service; both autopsy and biopsy tissue were investigated. Probes included DNA genomic fragments from cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr-Virus (EBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Methods of detection by Pathogene II kit (ENZO) and Blue Gene kit (BRL) with visualization by AEC, NBT/BCIP, Immunogold (Janssen) and autoradiography were used. The study shows most satisfactory results by applying the Blue Gene-NBT/BCIP combination followed by the Immunogold technique. Data obtained by these techniques compare well to those of using radioactive DNA probes and autoradiography.

摘要

我们将生物素化DNA探针和各种可视化技术的效率与病理科常规石蜡切片中35S标记的DNA探针进行了比较;研究了尸检和活检组织。探针包括来自巨细胞病毒(CMV)、爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的DNA基因组片段。使用了Pathogene II试剂盒(ENZO)和Blue Gene试剂盒(BRL)的检测方法,并通过AEC、NBT/BCIP、免疫金(杨森)和放射自显影进行可视化。该研究表明,应用Blue Gene-NBT/BCIP组合,其次是免疫金技术,可获得最满意的结果。通过这些技术获得的数据与使用放射性DNA探针和放射自显影的数据相比非常好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验