Suppr超能文献

在初级保健为基础的痛风队列中,对痛风活动评分进行痛风影响量表的首次验证。

First validation of the gout activity score against gout impact scale in a primary care based gout cohort.

机构信息

Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, NG5 1PB Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, NG5 1PB Nottingham, United Kingdom; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, NG5 1PB Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Joint Bone Spine. 2018 May;85(3):323-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To validate the gout activity score (GAS) against the gout impact scale in a primary care based gout cohort.

METHODS

This was a single-centre cross-sectional study. People with gout who participated in previous research at academic rheumatology, University of Nottingham, UK, and consented for participation in future studies were mailed a questionnaire in September 2015. Those returning completed questionnaires were invited to attend for a study visit at which blood was collected and musculoskeletal examination was performed. The Gout Assessment Questionnaire, which contains the gout impact scale (GIS), and short form (SF) 36v2 questionnaires were completed. The GAS score was calculated. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated to examine correlation between GAS and SF-36 v2, and GIS. Statistical analyses were performed using PASW v22.

RESULTS

One hundred and two (93% men) of the 150 participants who were mailed a questionnaire attended the study visit. Their mean (SD) age, body mass index, serum uric acid and GAS were 67.94 (9.93) years, 29.96 (4.57) kg/m, 5.25 (1.75) mg/dl, and 2.99 (0.74) respectively. There was moderate correlation between GAS and gout concern overall, unmet gout treatment need, and gout concern during an attack components of GIS (r=0.306 to 0.453), but no to poor correlation between GAS and summary scores and scales of SF-36 v2 (r=-0.090 to -0.251).

CONCLUSION

This first study to validate GAS against the GIS found moderate correlation. However, this study did not examine the predictive validity of GAS, and prospective studies are needed before GAS can be used widely.

摘要

目的

在初级保健为基础的痛风队列中,验证痛风活动评分(GAS)与痛风影响量表(GIS)的相关性。

方法

这是一项单中心横断面研究。英国诺丁汉大学学术风湿病学之前参与过研究且同意参与未来研究的痛风患者于 2015 年 9 月收到问卷。返回完成问卷的患者受邀参加研究访问,在研究访问中采集血液并进行肌肉骨骼检查。完成痛风评估问卷,其中包含 GIS 和 SF-36v2 问卷。计算 GAS 评分。采用斯皮尔曼相关系数来检验 GAS 与 SF-36v2 和 GIS 之间的相关性。采用 PASW v22 进行统计分析。

结果

150 名寄出问卷的参与者中有 102 名(93%为男性)参加了研究访问。他们的平均(SD)年龄、体重指数、血清尿酸和 GAS 分别为 67.94(9.93)岁、29.96(4.57)kg/m、5.25(1.75)mg/dl 和 2.99(0.74)。GAS 与 GIS 的总体痛风关注度、未满足的痛风治疗需求以及痛风发作期间的痛风关注度各成分之间存在中度相关性(r=0.306 至 0.453),但与 SF-36v2 的总分和量表之间的相关性较差(r=-0.090 至-0.251)。

结论

这是第一项验证 GAS 与 GIS 的相关性的研究,发现中度相关性。然而,本研究并未检验 GAS 的预测效度,在广泛应用 GAS 之前,需要进行前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验