Rammell James, Kansal Nisheeth, Bhattacharya Vish
Department of Vascular Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Avenue, Gateshead, NE9 6SX, United Kingdom.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Avenue, Gateshead, NE9 6SX, United Kingdom.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;36:30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 May 5.
Infected femoral pseudoaneurysms are a common presentation in intravenous drug users with little consensus as to the optimum management of these patients. Whilst emergency revascularisation options are available, excision and ligation of the femoral artery remains the most common operative intervention but risks leaving the patient with critical ischaemia or intermittent claudication. This case series reviewed the outcomes of 4 patients who underwent excision-ligation without revascularisation of an infected femoral pseudoaneurysm at a district general hospital.
Four patients (2 male, 2 female) with infected femoral pseudoaneurysms presented via the emergency room with diagnosis confirmed with contrast cross-sectional imaging. All patients underwent emergency excision and ligation of the pseudoaneurysm without revascularisation. One patient returned to theatre with critical ischaemia necessitating a hindquarter amputation. The remaining 3 patients were discharged without claudication symptoms.
With the identification of suitable patients and pre-operative optimisation, revascularisation can be performed in the emergency setting with an extra-anatomical bypass appearing to confer the best results. Currently endovascular approaches appear to be used only as a bridge to a future definitive revascularisation procedure, however, there are several case reports documenting successful outcomes when using a stent graft alongside a prolonged course of antibiotics. For the majority of patients, excision-ligation without revascularisation is both safe and effective as few are left with symptoms of limb ischaemia.
感染性股动脉假性动脉瘤在静脉吸毒者中很常见,对于这些患者的最佳治疗方案尚无共识。虽然有紧急血管重建的选择,但股动脉切除和结扎仍是最常见的手术干预方式,但有导致患者出现严重缺血或间歇性跛行的风险。本病例系列回顾了在一家地区综合医院接受感染性股动脉假性动脉瘤切除结扎且未进行血管重建的4例患者的治疗结果。
4例感染性股动脉假性动脉瘤患者(2男,2女)通过急诊室就诊,经对比横断面成像确诊。所有患者均接受了假性动脉瘤的急诊切除和结扎,未进行血管重建。1例患者因严重缺血返回手术室,需要进行半侧肢体截肢。其余3例患者出院时无跛行症状。
通过识别合适的患者并进行术前优化,可在急诊情况下进行血管重建,解剖外旁路似乎能取得最佳效果。目前,血管内治疗方法似乎仅用作未来确定性血管重建手术的桥梁,然而,有几例病例报告记录了在使用支架移植物并联合长期抗生素治疗时取得的成功结果。对于大多数患者而言,不进行血管重建的切除结扎既安全又有效,因为很少有人会出现肢体缺血症状。