Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Science (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia.
Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Science (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Chemosphere. 2017 Sep;182:656-664. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.071. Epub 2017 May 12.
Access to clean, safe drinking water poses a serious challenge to regulators, and requires analytical strategies capable of rapid screening and identification of potentially hazardous chemicals, specifically in situations when threats to water quality or security require rapid investigations and potential response. This study describes a fast and efficient chemical hazard screening strategy for characterising trace levels of polar organic contaminants in water matrices, based on liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry with post-acquisition 'case-control' data processing. This method allowed for a rapid response time of less than 24 h for the screening of target, suspect and non-target unknown chemicals via direct injection analysis, and a second, more sensitive analysis option requiring sample pre-concentration. The method was validated by fortifying samples with a range of pesticides, pharmaceuticals and personal care products (n = 46); with >90% of target compounds positively screened in samples at 1 ng mL, and 46% at 0.1 ng mL when analysed via direct injection. To simulate a contamination event samples were fortified with compounds not present in the commercial library (designated 'non-target compounds'; fipronil and fenitrothion), tentatively identified at 0.2 and 1 ng mL, respectively; and a compound not included in any known commercial library or public database (designated 'unknown' compounds; 8Cl perfluorooctanesulfonic acid), at 0.8 ng mL. The method was applied to two 'real-case' scenarios: (1) the assessment of drinking water safety during a high-profile event in Brisbane, Australia; and (2) to screen treated, re-circulated drinking water and pre-treated (raw) water. The validated workflow was effective for rapid prioritisation and screening of suspect and non-target potential hazards at trace levels, and could be applied to a wide range of matrices and investigations where comparison of organic contaminants between an affected and control site and or timeframe is warranted.
获取清洁、安全的饮用水对监管机构构成严重挑战,需要能够快速筛选和识别潜在危险化学品的分析策略,特别是在水质或安全受到威胁需要快速调查和潜在应对的情况下。本研究描述了一种快速有效的化学危害筛选策略,用于表征水中痕量极性有机污染物,基于液相色谱高分辨质谱,采用后采集“病例对照”数据处理。该方法允许通过直接进样分析对目标、可疑和非目标未知化学品进行快速响应,响应时间不到 24 小时,还可以选择第二种更敏感的分析选项,需要对样品进行预浓缩。该方法通过用一系列农药、药物和个人护理产品(n=46)对样品进行加标验证;在 1ng mL 时,超过 90%的目标化合物在样品中得到阳性筛选,在 0.1ng mL 时通过直接进样分析,46%得到阳性筛选;为了模拟污染事件,用商业文库中不存在的化合物(指定为“非目标化合物”;氟虫腈和三唑磷)对样品进行加标,分别在 0.2 和 1ng mL 时进行初步鉴定;以及一种不在任何已知商业文库或公共数据库中的化合物(指定为“未知”化合物;8Cl 全氟辛烷磺酸),在 0.8ng mL 时进行初步鉴定。该方法应用于两个“真实案例”场景:(1)评估澳大利亚布里斯班一次备受瞩目的事件期间的饮用水安全性;(2)用于筛选处理后的再循环饮用水和预处理(原水)。该验证工作流程可有效用于快速优先排序和痕量水平下的可疑和非目标潜在危害筛选,并可应用于广泛的基质和调查中,在这些调查中,需要比较受影响和对照地点以及时间框架之间的有机污染物。