Sjerps Rosa M A, Vughs Dennis, van Leerdam Jan A, Ter Laak Thomas L, van Wezel Annemarie P
KWR Watercycle Research Institute, P.O. Box 1072, 3430 BB, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
KWR Watercycle Research Institute, P.O. Box 1072, 3430 BB, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; Wageningen University, Sub-department Environmental Technology, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Water Res. 2016 Apr 15;93:254-264. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.034. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
For the prioritization of more than 5200 anthropogenic chemicals authorized on the European market, we use a large scale liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) suspect screening study. The prioritization is based on occurrence in 151 water samples including effluent, surface water, ground water and drinking water. The suspect screening linked over 700 detected compounds with known accurate masses to one or multiple suspects. Using a prioritization threshold and removing false positives reduced this to 113 detected compounds linked to 174 suspects, 24 compounds reflect a confirmed structure by comparison with the pure reference standard. The prioritized compounds and suspects are relevant for detailed risk assessments after confirmation of their identity. Only one of the 174 prioritized compounds and suspects is mentioned in water quality regulations, and only 20% is mentioned on existing lists of potentially relevant chemicals. This shows the complementarity to commonly used target-based methods. The semi-quantitative total concentration, expressed as internal standard equivalents of detected compounds linked to suspects, in effluents is approximately 10 times higher than in surface waters, while ground waters and drinking waters show the lowest response. The average retention time, a measure for hydrophobicity, of the detected compounds per sample decreased from effluent to surface- and groundwater to drinking water, confirming the occurrence of more polar compounds in drinking water. The semi-quantitative total concentrations exceed the conservative and precautionary threshold of toxicological concern. Therefore, adverse effects of mixtures cannot be neglected without a more thorough risk assessment.
为了对欧洲市场上获批的5200多种人造化学品进行优先级排序,我们开展了一项大规模液相色谱 - 高分辨率质谱(LC - HRMS)可疑物筛查研究。优先级排序基于151份水样中的出现情况,这些水样包括废水、地表水、地下水和饮用水。可疑物筛查将700多种检测到的具有已知精确质量的化合物与一个或多个可疑物联系起来。使用优先级阈值并去除假阳性结果后,这一数量减少到113种检测到的化合物与174个可疑物相关,其中24种化合物通过与纯参考标准品比较确定了结构。在确认其身份后,这些优先级化合物和可疑物对于详细的风险评估具有重要意义。174种优先级化合物和可疑物中只有一种在水质法规中被提及,在现有的潜在相关化学品清单中也仅提及了20%。这表明了其与常用的基于目标物方法的互补性。以与可疑物相关的检测化合物的内标等效物表示的半定量总浓度,废水中大约比地表水中高10倍,而地下水和饮用水的响应最低。每个样品中检测到的化合物的平均保留时间(疏水性的一种度量)从废水到地表水、地下水再到饮用水逐渐降低,这证实了饮用水中存在更多极性化合物。半定量总浓度超过了毒理学关注的保守和预防阈值。因此,在没有更全面的风险评估的情况下,不能忽视混合物的不利影响。