Mikulyuk Alison, Barton Martha, Hauxwell Jennifer, Hein Catherine, Kujawa Ellen, Minahan Kristi, Nault Michelle E, Oele Daniel L, Wagner Kelly I
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Limnology, 680 N Park Street, Madison, WI 53706, United States; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Science Services, 2801 Progress Road, Madison, WI 53716, United States.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Science Services, 2801 Progress Road, Madison, WI 53716, United States; Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, MS 39762, United States.
J Environ Manage. 2017 Sep 1;199:172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 19.
Bioassessment methods are critically needed to evaluate and monitor lake ecological condition. Aquatic macrophytes are good candidate indicators, but few lake bioassessment methods developed in North America use them. The few macrophyte bioassessment methods that do exist suffer from problems related to subjectivity and discernibility along disturbance gradients. We developed and tested a bioassessment approach for 462 north temperate lakes. The approach links macrophyte abundance to lake ecological condition via estimates of taxon-specific abundance-weighted tolerance to anthropogenic disturbance. Using variables related to eutrophication, urban development and agriculture, we calculated abundance-weighted tolerance ranges for 59 macrophyte taxa and clustered them according to their tolerance to anthropogenic disturbance. We also created a composite index of anthropogenic disturbance using 20 variables related to population density, land cover and water chemistry. We used a statistical approach to set ecological condition thresholds based on the observed abundance of sensitive, moderately tolerant and tolerant taxa in each lake. The resulting lake condition categories were usually stable across multiple survey events and largely agreed with condition rankings assigned using expert judgment. We suggest using this macrophyte bioassessment method for federal water quality reports, restoration and management on north temperate lakes.
迫切需要生物评估方法来评估和监测湖泊生态状况。水生大型植物是很好的候选指标,但北美开发的湖泊生物评估方法很少使用它们。现有的少数大型植物生物评估方法存在与主观性和沿干扰梯度的可辨别性相关的问题。我们为462个北温带湖泊开发并测试了一种生物评估方法。该方法通过对特定分类群对人为干扰的丰度加权耐受性估计,将大型植物丰度与湖泊生态状况联系起来。利用与富营养化、城市发展和农业相关的变量,我们计算了59种大型植物分类群的丰度加权耐受范围,并根据它们对人为干扰的耐受性进行聚类。我们还使用与人口密度、土地覆盖和水化学相关的20个变量创建了人为干扰综合指数。我们采用统计方法,根据每个湖泊中敏感、中度耐受和耐受分类群的观测丰度设定生态状况阈值。由此产生的湖泊状况类别在多个调查事件中通常是稳定的,并且在很大程度上与使用专家判断指定的状况排名一致。我们建议将这种大型植物生物评估方法用于联邦水质报告、北温带湖泊的恢复和管理。