Suppr超能文献

在泌乳奶牛日粮中饲喂长麦干草与饲喂短麦青贮对采食量、产奶量和消化率的影响。

Effect of feeding long or short wheat hay v. wheat silage in the ration of lactating cows on intake, milk production and digestibility.

机构信息

1Department of Ruminant Science,Agricultural Research Organization,HaMaccabim Road 68,P.O.B 15159 Rishon LeZion 7528809,Israel.

3Dept of Life Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences,Ben-Gurion University,P.O. Box 653 Beer-Sheva,Israel.

出版信息

Animal. 2017 Dec;11(12):2203-2210. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117001100. Epub 2017 May 23.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate in lactating cows the effect of either chopping or ensiling of wheat roughage on: intake, digestibility, lactation performance and animal behavior. Three groups of 14 lactating cows each, were fed total mixed rations (TMRs) based on either long wheat hay (HL), short wheat hay (HS) or wheat silage (SI), as the sole roughage source (30% of TMR dry matter (DM)). Parameters examined: sorting behavior, DM intake, milk yield and composition, rumination, recumbence, average daily rumen pH, digesta passage rate, and in-vivo digestibility. Performance data was summarized by day and analyzed using a proc-mixed model. The content of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF) was similar in the HL and SI and lower in the HS, resulting in similar differences among the three corresponding TMRs. In vitro DM digestibility of wheat silage was higher than that of the two hays (65.6% v. 62.8%) resulting in higher in vitro DM digestibility of the SI-TMR compared with the hay-based TMRs (79.3 v. 77.0%). HS-TMR was better than HL- or SI-TMRs at preventing feed sorting by cows after 12 or 24 h eating of the diets. Cows fed HS-TMR consumed more DM and NDF but less peNDF than the other two groups. Average daily rumen pH was similar in the three groups, but daily rumination time was highest in the cows fed HS-TMR. Rumen retention time was longest in cows fed HL-TMR. DM digestibility in cows fed SI-TMR was higher than that of HS and HL groups (65.2%, 61.8% and 62.4%, respectively), but NDF digestibility was similar in the three treatments. The highest intake of digestible DM was observed in cows fed SI-TMR, HS cows were intermediate and HL cows were the lowest. Consequently, cows fed SI-TMR had higher yields of milk, 4% fat corrected milk and energy-corrected milk (47.1, 42.9 and 43.2 kg/day, respectively) than cows fed HS-TMR (45.7, 41.0 and 41.0 kg/day, respectively) or HL-TMR (44.1, 40.3 and 40.3 kg/day, respectively). Net energy production (NEL+M+gain) per kg DM intake was highest in the SI-TMR, lowest in the HS-TMR and intermediate in the HL-TMR (1.52, 1.40 and 1.45, respectively). Animal welfare, as expressed in daily recumbence time and BW gain was similar in the SI and HS groups and higher than the HL cows.

摘要

本研究旨在评估泌乳奶牛采食切碎或青贮小麦粗饲料对以下方面的影响

采食量、消化率、泌乳性能和动物行为。将 42 头泌乳奶牛分为 3 组,每组 14 头,分别饲喂以长麦干草(HL)、短麦干草(HS)或小麦青贮(SI)为唯一粗饲料来源的全混合日粮(TMR;占 TMR 干物质的 30%)。检测参数:分拣行为、DM 采食量、产奶量和组成、反刍、卧息、平均日瘤胃 pH 值、食糜通过速度和体内消化率。通过每日汇总性能数据并使用 proc-mixed 模型进行分析。HL 和 SI 的物理有效中性洗涤纤维(peNDF)含量相似,HS 中的含量较低,导致这三种相应 TMR 之间存在相似的差异。与两种干草相比,小麦青贮的体外 DM 消化率更高(65.6% 比 62.8%),因此 SI-TMR 的体外 DM 消化率高于基于干草的 TMR(79.3% 比 77.0%)。与 HS-TMR 和 HL-TMR 相比,HS-TMR 可更好地防止奶牛在采食日粮 12 或 24 小时后进行饲料分拣。与其他两组相比,采食 HS-TMR 的奶牛 DM 和 NDF 采食量更高,但 peNDF 采食量较低。三组间平均日瘤胃 pH 值相似,但采食 HS-TMR 的奶牛每日反刍时间最长。采食 HL-TMR 的奶牛的瘤胃滞留时间最长。采食 SI-TMR 的奶牛 DM 消化率高于 HS 和 HL 组(65.2%、61.8%和 62.4%),但三种处理方式的 NDF 消化率相似。采食 SI-TMR 的奶牛对可消化 DM 的摄入量最高,HS 奶牛居中,HL 奶牛最低。因此,采食 SI-TMR 的奶牛的产奶量、校正乳脂量和校正能量奶量最高(分别为 47.1、42.9 和 43.2kg/天),采食 HS-TMR 的奶牛(分别为 45.7、41.0 和 41.0kg/天)或 HL-TMR(分别为 44.1、40.3 和 40.3kg/天)。每千克 DM 采食量的净能产量(NEL+M+增重)以 SI-TMR 最高,HS-TMR 最低,HL-TMR 居中(分别为 1.52、1.40 和 1.45)。SI 和 HS 组的动物福利(每日卧息时间和 BW 增重表示)与 HL 奶牛相似或高于 HL 奶牛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验