Fleischmann A, Urca G
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Tel Aviv University School of Medicine, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
Physiol Behav. 1988;44(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90343-5.
In the present study we have attempted to characterize, in mice, a situation which appears to simulate real life predation and elicits simultaneous analgesia and immobility. We utilized pinch produced by clip application to various regions of the body and examined its effect on responsiveness to noxious stimuli and motor behavior. Intense noxious clip was applied to the nape of the neck, back and base of the tail. The area most effective for the elicitation of both clip induced analgesia and immobility was the nape of the neck while tail pinch resulted in analgesia but not immobility. Evidence is provided that different systems are responsible for clip induced immobility and analgesia. Temporal dissociation of clip induced analgesia and immobility could be demonstrated with continuous clip application for 30 min showing a different time course for the analgesic and immobilizing effects. Different stimuli were effective in eliciting clip induced analgesia and immobility with noxious stimuli essential for the induction of clip induced analgesia and innocuous stimuli sufficient for clip induced immobility. Thus, low analgesic doses of local anesthetics injected into the nape of the neck prevented noxious clip from inducing analgesia but immobility was still evident. In contrast, nonnoxious pinch to the nape of the neck elicited immobility but not analgesia and clip induced immobility could still be induced after the administration of high doses of morphine which completely blocked responses to noxious stimuli. These results demonstrate that in a situation resembling natural predation both analgesia and immobility are produced concurrently but that these behavioral phenomena can be elicited differentially and may be mediated by different independent systems.
在本研究中,我们试图在小鼠身上描述一种似乎模拟现实生活中捕食行为并引发同时性镇痛和不动反应的情况。我们利用夹子夹身体不同部位产生的捏夹刺激,并研究其对有害刺激反应性和运动行为的影响。将强烈的有害夹子夹在颈部、背部和尾巴根部。对引发夹子诱导的镇痛和不动反应最有效的区域是颈部,而夹尾巴则导致镇痛但不引起不动反应。有证据表明,不同的系统分别负责夹子诱导的不动反应和镇痛。通过持续夹30分钟可证明夹子诱导的镇痛和不动反应在时间上的分离,显示出镇痛和致动效应有不同的时间进程。不同的刺激在引发夹子诱导的镇痛和不动反应方面是有效的,有害刺激对于诱导夹子诱导的镇痛是必需的,而无害刺激足以引发夹子诱导的不动反应。因此,将低剂量的局部麻醉剂注射到颈部可防止有害夹子诱导镇痛,但不动反应仍然明显。相反,对颈部进行无害捏夹会引发不动反应但不引起镇痛,并且在给予高剂量吗啡完全阻断对有害刺激的反应后,仍可诱导夹子诱导的不动反应。这些结果表明,在类似自然捕食的情况下,镇痛和不动反应会同时产生,但这些行为现象可以通过不同方式引发,并且可能由不同的独立系统介导。