Draghini Lorena, Maranzano Ernesto, Casale Michelina, Trippa Fabio, Anselmo Paola, Arcidiacono Fabio, Fabiani Stefania, Italiani Marco, Chirico Luigia, Muti Marco
Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, "S. Maria" Hospital, Terni, Italy.
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2017 Apr;9(2):118-123. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2017.67454. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
To report our experience on high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in patients with stage I-III endometrial cancer unfit to surgery.
Seventeen patients underwent HDR-BT as definitive treatment. Median age was 79 years (range, 60-95), median Karnofsky performance status 90% (range, 60-100). Histology was endometrial adenocarcinoma in 14 (82%), and non-endometrial in 3 (18%) patients. In 15 (88%) patients, clinical stage was I and in remaining 2 (12%) was III. All patients were evaluated with computed tomography (CT) and endometrial biopsy. Using the Fletcher applicator, a CT-based planning HDR-BT was delivered. Local control (LC) was obtained when there was an interruption of vaginal bleeding in absence of CT-imaging progression.
Fourteen patients underwent HDR-BT alone and three external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with HDR-BT. All patients had a clinical LC, after a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 6-131), 3 and 6 years LC rates were 86% and 69%, respectively. Cancer specific survival (CSS) at 1, 2, and 6 years was 93%, 85%, and 85%, respectively. Age, stage, dose, and type of radiotherapy did not result significant prognostic factors for LC and CSS. Only histology significantly influenced LC: for high-risk histology (i.e., non-endometrial carcinoma or grade [G] 3 endometrial adenocarcinoma) LC was 73% at 1 year and 36% at 6 years; for low-risk histology (i.e., G1-2 endometrial adenocarcinoma) was 100% at 1 and 6 years ( = 0.05). Two (12%) patients had G2 acute toxicity and two others (12%) G1 late toxicity.
Although some limitations of our analysis (relatively few number of patients recruited, retrospective evaluation, and consequent suboptimal patient selection), it confirms effectiveness and safety of definitive HDR-BT for medically inoperable stage I-III endometrial cancer. The best LC was obtained in stage I low-risk histology.
报告我们对不适合手术的I - III期子宫内膜癌患者进行高剂量率近距离放疗(HDR - BT)的经验。
17例患者接受HDR - BT作为确定性治疗。中位年龄为79岁(范围60 - 95岁),中位卡诺夫斯基功能状态为90%(范围60 - 100)。组织学类型为子宫内膜腺癌14例(82%),非子宫内膜癌3例(18%)。15例(88%)患者临床分期为I期,其余2例(12%)为III期。所有患者均接受计算机断层扫描(CT)和子宫内膜活检评估。使用弗莱彻施源器,进行基于CT的计划HDR - BT。当阴道出血停止且CT成像无进展时获得局部控制(LC)。
14例患者仅接受HDR - BT,3例接受外照射放疗(EBRT)联合HDR - BT。所有患者均获得临床局部控制,中位随访53个月(范围6 - 131个月)后,3年和6年局部控制率分别为86%和69%。1年、2年和6年的癌症特异性生存率(CSS)分别为93%、85%和85%。年龄、分期、剂量和放疗类型对局部控制和癌症特异性生存不是显著的预后因素。仅组织学对局部控制有显著影响:对于高危组织学类型(即非子宫内膜癌或3级[G]子宫内膜腺癌),1年局部控制率为73%,6年为36%;对于低危组织学类型(即G1 - 2级子宫内膜腺癌),1年和6年局部控制率均为100%(P = 0.05)。2例(12%)患者出现2级急性毒性反应,另外2例(12%)出现1级晚期毒性反应。
尽管我们的分析存在一些局限性(招募患者数量相对较少、回顾性评估以及因此导致的患者选择不够理想),但它证实了确定性HDR - BT治疗医学上无法手术的I - III期子宫内膜癌的有效性和安全性。I期低危组织学类型患者获得了最佳的局部控制。