Suppr超能文献

小团体如何做出决策?:一个为临床能力委员会的实施和研究提供信息的理论框架。

How do small groups make decisions? : A theoretical framework to inform the implementation and study of clinical competency committees.

作者信息

Chahine Saad, Cristancho Sayra, Padgett Jessica, Lingard Lorelei

机构信息

Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Jun;6(3):192-198. doi: 10.1007/s40037-017-0357-x.

Abstract

In the competency-based medical education (CBME) approach, clinical competency committees are responsible for making decisions about trainees' competence. However, we currently lack a theoretical model for group decision-making to inform this emerging assessment phenomenon. This paper proposes an organizing framework to study and guide the decision-making processes of clinical competency committees.This is an explanatory, non-exhaustive review, tailored to identify relevant theoretical and evidence-based papers related to small group decision-making. The search was conducted using Google Scholar, Web of Science, MEDLINE, ERIC, and PsycINFO for relevant literature. Using a thematic analysis, two researchers (SC & JP) met four times between April-June 2016 to consolidate the literature included in this review.Three theoretical orientations towards group decision-making emerged from the review: schema, constructivist, and social influence. Schema orientations focus on how groups use algorithms for decision-making. Constructivist orientations focus on how groups construct their shared understanding. Social influence orientations focus on how individual members influence the group's perspective on a decision. Moderators of decision-making relevant to all orientations include: guidelines, stressors, authority, and leadership.Clinical competency committees are the mechanisms by which groups of clinicians will be in charge of interpreting multiple assessment data points and coming to a shared decision about trainee competence. The way in which these committees make decisions can have huge implications for trainee progression and, ultimately, patient care. Therefore, there is a pressing need to build the science of how such group decision-making works in practice. This synthesis suggests a preliminary organizing framework that can be used in the implementation and study of clinical competency committees.

摘要

在基于能力的医学教育(CBME)方法中,临床能力委员会负责就学员的能力做出决策。然而,我们目前缺乏一个用于群体决策的理论模型来为这一新兴的评估现象提供指导。本文提出了一个组织框架,以研究和指导临床能力委员会的决策过程。这是一项解释性的、非详尽无遗的综述,旨在识别与小组决策相关的理论和循证文献。通过谷歌学术、科学网、MEDLINE、教育资源信息中心和心理学文摘数据库搜索相关文献。采用主题分析法,两位研究人员(SC和JP)在2016年4月至6月期间会面了四次,以整合本综述中纳入的文献。综述中出现了三种关于群体决策的理论取向:图式取向、建构主义取向和社会影响取向。图式取向关注群体如何使用算法进行决策。建构主义取向关注群体如何构建他们的共同理解。社会影响取向关注个体成员如何影响群体对决策的看法。与所有取向相关的决策调节因素包括:指导方针、压力源、权威和领导力。临床能力委员会是临床医生群体负责解释多个评估数据点并就学员能力达成共同决策的机制。这些委员会做出决策的方式可能对学员的进展以及最终的患者护理产生重大影响。因此,迫切需要建立关于这种群体决策在实践中如何运作的科学。本综述提出了一个初步的组织框架,可用于临床能力委员会的实施和研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d2/5466572/253fe77fc8b6/40037_2017_357_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验