• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对学龄期听力损失儿童的自适应噪声管理技术的评估。

Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.

作者信息

Wolfe Jace, Duke Mila, Schafer Erin, Jones Christine, Rakita Lori

机构信息

Hearts for Hearing Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK.

Department of Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 May;28(5):415-435. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16015.

DOI:10.3766/jaaa.16015
PMID:28534732
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with hearing loss experience significant difficulty understanding speech in noisy and reverberant situations. Adaptive noise management technologies, such as fully adaptive directional microphones and digital noise reduction, have the potential to improve communication in noise for children with hearing aids. However, there are no published studies evaluating the potential benefits children receive from the use of adaptive noise management technologies in simulated real-world environments as well as in daily situations.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare speech recognition, speech intelligibility ratings (SIRs), and sound preferences of children using hearing aids equipped with and without adaptive noise management technologies.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A single-group, repeated measures design was used to evaluate performance differences obtained in four simulated environments. In each simulated environment, participants were tested in a basic listening program with minimal noise management features, a manual program designed for that scene, and the hearing instruments' adaptive operating system that steered hearing instrument parameterization based on the characteristics of the environment.

STUDY SAMPLE

Twelve children with mild to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Speech recognition and SIRs were evaluated in three hearing aid programs with and without noise management technologies across two different test sessions and various listening environments. Also, the participants' perceptual hearing performance in daily real-world listening situations with two of the hearing aid programs was evaluated during a four- to six-week field trial that took place between the two laboratory sessions.

RESULTS

On average, the use of adaptive noise management technology improved sentence recognition in noise for speech presented in front of the participant but resulted in a decrement in performance for signals arriving from behind when the participant was facing forward. However, the improvement with adaptive noise management exceeded the decrement obtained when the signal arrived from behind. Most participants reported better subjective SIRs when using adaptive noise management technologies, particularly when the signal of interest arrived from in front of the listener. In addition, most participants reported a preference for the technology with an automatically switching, adaptive directional microphone and adaptive noise reduction in real-world listening situations when compared to conventional, omnidirectional microphone use with minimal noise reduction processing.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the adaptive noise management technologies evaluated in this study improves school-age children's speech recognition in noise for signals arriving from the front. Although a small decrement in speech recognition in noise was observed for signals arriving from behind the listener, most participants reported a preference for use of noise management technology both when the signal arrived from in front and from behind the child. The results of this study suggest that adaptive noise management technologies should be considered for use with school-age children when listening in academic and social situations.

摘要

背景

听力损失儿童在嘈杂和混响环境中理解言语存在显著困难。自适应噪声管理技术,如全自适应方向性麦克风和数字降噪技术,有可能改善佩戴助听器儿童在噪声环境中的交流。然而,尚无已发表的研究评估儿童在模拟真实世界环境以及日常情况下使用自适应噪声管理技术所获得的潜在益处。

目的

本研究的目的是比较使用配备和未配备自适应噪声管理技术的助听器的儿童的言语识别、言语可懂度评分(SIR)和声音偏好。

研究设计

采用单组重复测量设计来评估在四种模拟环境中获得的性能差异。在每个模拟环境中,参与者在具有最小噪声管理功能的基本听力程序、为该场景设计的手动程序以及基于环境特征引导助听器参数设置的助听器自适应操作系统中进行测试。

研究样本

12名轻度至中度重度感音神经性听力损失儿童。

数据收集与分析

在两个不同的测试时段以及各种聆听环境中,对配备和未配备噪声管理技术的三种助听器程序进行言语识别和SIR评估。此外,在两次实验室测试之间进行的为期四至六周的现场试验中,评估了参与者在日常真实聆听情况下使用其中两种助听器程序时的感知听力表现。

结果

平均而言,使用自适应噪声管理技术可提高参与者前方呈现言语在噪声中的句子识别能力,但当参与者面向前方时,来自后方的信号性能会下降。然而,自适应噪声管理带来的改善超过了信号从后方传来时的性能下降。大多数参与者报告称,使用自适应噪声管理技术时主观SIR更好,尤其是当感兴趣的信号从听众前方传来时。此外,与使用具有最小降噪处理的传统全向麦克风相比,大多数参与者报告在真实世界聆听情况下更喜欢具有自动切换的自适应方向性麦克风和自适应降噪功能的技术。

结论

本研究中评估的自适应噪声管理技术的使用提高了学龄儿童对前方传来信号在噪声中的言语识别能力。尽管观察到听众后方传来的信号在噪声中的言语识别略有下降,但大多数参与者报告称,当信号从儿童前方和后方传来时,都更喜欢使用噪声管理技术。本研究结果表明,在学术和社交场合聆听时,应考虑为学龄儿童使用自适应噪声管理技术。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.对学龄期听力损失儿童的自适应噪声管理技术的评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 May;28(5):415-435. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16015.
2
The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.助听器技术对在汽车中聆听的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jun;24(6):474-85. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.6.4.
3
Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.评估助听儿童使用噪声管理技术的潜在益处和局限性。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2022 Feb;33(2):66-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735802. Epub 2022 May 5.
4
Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.模拟教室环境下双侧非对称和对称助听麦克模式的语音识别。
Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):601-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182886d1e.
5
Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.三麦克风波束形成器远程麦克风系统评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Jan;31(1):50-60. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18065. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
6
An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.在嘈杂实验室环境中对助听器波束形成麦克风阵列的评估。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Feb;30(2):131-144. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17090. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
7
Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.助听器中全向性与用户可选择的麦克风模式
Ear Hear. 2003 Oct;24(5):424-39. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000094555.89110.0A.
8
Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.助听器中三种类型的定向处理的潜在益处与局限性。
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):339-52. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000004.
9
Individual Differences Offer Insight Into Clinical Recommendations for Directional and Remote Microphone Technology Use in Children.个体差异为儿童定向和远程麦克风技术使用的临床建议提供了见解。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Feb 17;64(2):635-650. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00281. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
10
How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.定向麦克风如何影响中重度听力损失患者的言语识别、聆听努力和定位。
Int J Audiol. 2017 Dec;56(12):909-918. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1355074. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing Aid apps: are they safe, practical and beneficial for children and teens in challenging situations?助听 APP:对于处于困境中的儿童和青少年,它们安全、实用且有益吗?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):6021-6029. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08851-2. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.测量双侧人工耳蜗植入儿童掩蔽空间释放的新方法。
Ear Hear. 2022 Jan/Feb;43(1):101-114. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001080.