Sousa Claudia Sofia, Neves Mariana Rigueiro, Passos Ana Margarida, Ferreira Aristides, Sá Maria José
a Centro Hospitalar São João Porto , Neurology, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro , Porto , Portugal.
b BRU-IUL , Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL) , Lisbon , Portugal.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2018 Sep-Oct;25(5):417-423. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2017.1323752. Epub 2017 May 23.
The main goal of this study was to produce adjusted normative data for the Portuguese population on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT 3.0 s), the version used in the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests developed by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. The study included 326 community-dwelling individuals (199 women and 127 men) aged between 20 and 70 (mean = 40.33, SD = 14.40), who had educational backgrounds ranging from 4 to 23 years of schooling (mean = 12.28, SD = 4.39). Age, gender and qualifications revealed differences in explaining their performance on the PASAT 3.0 s. Men had significantly better performance on the PASAT 3.0 s than women, even though this represents a small effect size r = 0.18. Demographically corrected normative data was developed and important information regarding performance on the PASAT 3.0 s test is provided. Results are discussed and presented in tables and a formula is presented for computing age, gender and education adjusted T-scores for performance on the PASAT 3.0 s. These results should be considered as useful reference values for clinicians and investigators when applying the PASAT 3.0 s to assess cognitive function like information processing speed in different pathologies.
本研究的主要目标是为葡萄牙人群生成关于定时听觉连续加法测验(PASAT 3.0秒)的校正常模数据,该版本用于美国国家多发性硬化症协会开发的简短可重复神经心理测验组。该研究纳入了326名居住在社区的个体(199名女性和127名男性),年龄在20至70岁之间(平均=40.33,标准差=14.40),受教育年限从4年到23年不等(平均=12.28,标准差=4.39)。年龄、性别和学历在解释他们在PASAT 3.0秒测验中的表现时存在差异。男性在PASAT 3.0秒测验中的表现显著优于女性,尽管效应量较小,r=0.18。制定了经人口统计学校正的常模数据,并提供了关于PASAT 3.0秒测验表现的重要信息。对结果进行了讨论并以表格形式呈现,还给出了一个用于计算PASAT 3.0秒测验表现的年龄、性别和教育程度校正T分数的公式。当应用PASAT 3.0秒测验评估不同病症中的认知功能(如信息处理速度)时,这些结果应被视为临床医生和研究人员的有用参考值。