Clinical implications of hypothermic ventricular fibrillation versus beating-heart technique during cardiopulmonary bypass for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the effects of hypothermic ventricular fibrillation and beating-heart techniques during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on postoperative outcomes after simple pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 47 patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot at a single institution, who received pulmonary valve replacement under the ventricular fibrillation or beating-heart technique without cardioplegic cardiac arrest during CPB between January 2005 and April 2015.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into fibrillation (n = 32) and beating-heart (n = 15) groups. On comparing these groups, the fibrillation group had a larger sinotubular junction (27.1 ± 4.6 vs 22.1 ± 2.4 mm), had a longer operation duration (396 ± 108 vs 345 ± 57 min), required more postoperative transfusions (2.1 ± 2.6 vs 5.0 ± 6.3 units) and had a higher vasoactive-inotropic score at intensive care unit admission (8.0 vs 10, all P < 0.05). Echocardiographic data indicated that the systolic internal diameter of the left ventricle was larger in the fibrillation group than in the beating-heart group immediately after surgery and at the 1-year follow-up. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 3 cases, all from the fibrillation group. Among 7 patients from the fibrillation group with transoesophageal echocardiography data during CPB, 6 had fully opened aortic valves during fibrillation, causing flooding into the left ventricle and left ventricle distension.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative outcomes are worse with the ventricular fibrillation technique than with the beating-heart technique during CPB for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.