• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗、阿柏西普和地塞米松植入物治疗视网膜血管阻塞继发黄斑水肿贝伐单抗治疗失败后的比较

Comparison of Intravitreal Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, and Dexamethasone Implant after Bevacizumab Failure in Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vascular Occlusions.

作者信息

Hanhart Joel, Rozenman Yaacov

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Ophthalmologica. 2017;238(1-2):110-118. doi: 10.1159/000473864. Epub 2017 May 24.

DOI:10.1159/000473864
PMID:28535531
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and anatomic outcomes of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion after switching from bevacizumab to ranibizumab, aflibercept, or dexamethasone implant.

METHODS

Fifteen eyes were switched to ranibizumab, 12 to aflibercept, and 10 to dexamethasone. At 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, the outcome measures were visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT).

RESULTS

One year after the switch, CMT decreased from 430.11 ± 91.21 to 291.86 ± 43.87 μm (p < 0.001). VA increased in 59.5% of the eyes. No difference between the groups was found in those outcomes at 1 year, but the number of injections varied: 3.30 ± 0.95 for dexamethasone, 6.50 ± 2.11 for aflibercept, and 8.27 ± 2.37 for ranibizumab (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the eyes that failed initial bevacizumab therapy benefit from switching to another modality. The number of required injections during the first year after the switch varies.

摘要

目的

比较视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿患者从贝伐单抗转换为雷珠单抗、阿柏西普或地塞米松植入剂后的视力和解剖学结果。

方法

15只眼转换为雷珠单抗,12只眼转换为阿柏西普,10只眼转换为地塞米松。在3、6、9和12个月时,测量指标为视力(VA)和中心黄斑厚度(CMT)。

结果

转换治疗1年后,CMT从430.11±91.21μm降至291.86±43.87μm(p<0.001)。59.5%的患眼视力提高。1年后,各治疗组在这些结果上未发现差异,但注射次数有所不同:地塞米松组为3.30±0.95次,阿柏西普组为6.50±2.11次,雷珠单抗组为8.27±2.37次(p<0.001)。

结论

大多数初始贝伐单抗治疗失败的患眼从转换为其他治疗方式中获益。转换治疗后第一年所需的注射次数有所不同。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Intravitreal Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, and Dexamethasone Implant after Bevacizumab Failure in Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vascular Occlusions.玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗、阿柏西普和地塞米松植入物治疗视网膜血管阻塞继发黄斑水肿贝伐单抗治疗失败后的比较
Ophthalmologica. 2017;238(1-2):110-118. doi: 10.1159/000473864. Epub 2017 May 24.
2
Aflibercept for Previously Treated Macular Edema Associated with Central Retinal Vein Occlusions: 1-Year Results of the NEWTON Study.阿柏西普治疗既往治疗过的与视网膜中央静脉阻塞相关的黄斑水肿:NEWTON研究的1年结果
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Feb;2(2):128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
3
Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema in Eyes Previously Treated With Ranibizumab and/or Bevacizumab May Further Improve Macular Thickness.阿柏西普用于曾接受雷珠单抗和/或贝伐单抗治疗的糖尿病性黄斑水肿眼,可能会进一步改善黄斑厚度。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016 Sep 1;47(9):836-9. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20160901-06.
4
Outcomes of switching treatment to aflibercept in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion refractory to ranibizumab.雷珠单抗治疗无效的视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿患者改用阿柏西普治疗的效果
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;38(1):207-213. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0512-8. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
Switch to aflibercept or ranibizumab after initial treatment with bevacizumab in eyes with neovascular AMD.在新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(neovascular AMD)患者中,初始使用贝伐单抗治疗后改用阿柏西普或雷珠单抗。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 May 23;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0471-x.
6
EFFICACY AND FREQUENCY OF INTRAVITREAL AFLIBERCEPT VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB FOR MACULAR EDEMA SECONDARY TO CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION.阿柏西普与雷珠单抗治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的疗效及频率。
Retina. 2018 Sep;38(9):1795-1800. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001782.
7
Prospective study of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions in eyes not responsive to long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.前瞻性研究阿柏西普治疗对长期贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗无反应的视网膜静脉阻塞继发持续性黄斑水肿的疗效。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;48(1):53-60. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13636. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
A meta-analysis of patients with treatment-resistant macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions following switching to aflibercept.一项针对视网膜静脉阻塞继发治疗抵抗性黄斑水肿患者转换为阿柏西普治疗的荟萃分析。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;97(1):15-23. doi: 10.1111/aos.13802. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
9
Short-Term Effects of Early Switching to Ranibizumab or Aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema Cases With Non-Response to Bevacizumab.在对贝伐单抗无反应的糖尿病性黄斑水肿病例中早期改用雷珠单抗或阿柏西普的短期效果
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Mar 1;48(3):230-236. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20170301-06.
10
Comparison between ranibizumab and aflibercept for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion.雷珠单抗与阿柏西普治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞相关黄斑水肿的比较。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;61(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s10384-016-0476-7. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone versus intravitreal aflibercept implants for macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.地塞米松与玻璃体内注射阿柏西普植入物治疗黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 15;30(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02404-x.
2
Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Switch after Anti-VEGF Treatment in Patients Affected by Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Review of the Literature.视网膜静脉阻塞患者抗VEGF治疗后玻璃体内地塞米松植入物的转换:文献综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 23;13(17):5006. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175006.
3
Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Burden of Aflibercept 2 mg and Ranibizumab in Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
阿柏西普2mg与雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的疗效、安全性及治疗负担:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 May;13(5):1255-1269. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00915-0. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Efficacy of single-dose intravitreal dexamethasone implantation for retinal vein occlusion patients with refractory macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单剂量玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入术治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并难治性黄斑水肿的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 28;13:951666. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.951666. eCollection 2022.
5
[Retinal vein occlusion : Intravitreal pharmacotherapies and treatment strategies for the management of macular edema].[视网膜静脉阻塞:玻璃体内药物治疗及黄斑水肿管理的治疗策略]
Ophthalmologie. 2022 Nov;119(11):1100-1110. doi: 10.1007/s00347-022-01735-y. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
6
Comparison of intravitreal aflibercept and dexamethasone implant in the treatment of macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy or retinal vein occlusion: a Meta-analysis and systematic review.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普与地塞米松植入物治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变或视网膜静脉阻塞相关黄斑水肿的比较:一项Meta分析和系统评价
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 18;15(9):1511-1519. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.09.15. eCollection 2022.
7
Clinical Use of Dexamethasone Implants in Resistant Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vascular Occlusion Compared with Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.地塞米松植入物在视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发的难治性黄斑水肿中的临床应用与玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的比较
Beyoglu Eye J. 2019 Apr 10;4(1):11-16. doi: 10.14744/bej.2019.63835. eCollection 2019.
8
Effect of Alternate Treatment with Intravitreal Corticosteroid and Anti-VEGF for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion.玻璃体内注射皮质类固醇与抗血管内皮生长因子交替治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的效果
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 28;2021:5948113. doi: 10.1155/2021/5948113. eCollection 2021.
9
Real-life medium term follow-up data for intravitreal dexamethasone implant in retinal vein occlusion.玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的真实世界中期随访数据。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87467-6.
10
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.抗血管内皮生长因子治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发的黄斑水肿
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD009510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009510.pub3.