Wang Tianyi, Zhang Yang, Su Huijuan, Li Zhexuan, Zhang Lian, Ma Junling, Liu Weidong, Zhou Tong, You Weicheng, Pan Kaifeng
Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Chin J Cancer Res. 2017 Apr;29(2):127-136. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.02.05.
To identify serum biomarkers that may predict the short or long term outcomes of anti- () treatment, a follow-up study was performed based on an intervention trial in Linqu County, China.
A total of 529 subjects were selected randomly from 1,803 participants to evaluate total anti- immunoglobulin G (IgG) and 10 specific antibody levels before and after treatment at 1-, 2- and 7.3-year. The outcomes of anti- treatment were also parallelly assessed byC-urea breath test at 45-d after treatment and 7.3-year at the end of follow-up.
We found the medians of anti- IgG titers were consistently below cut-off value through 7.3 years in eradicated group, however, the medians declined in recurrence group to 1.2 at 1-year after treatment and slightly increased to 2.0 at 7.3-year. While the medians were significantly higher (>3.0 at 2- and 7.3-year) among subjects who failed the eradication or received placebo. For specific antibody responses, baseline seropositivities of FliD and HpaA were reversely associated with eradication failure [for FliD, odds ratio (OR)=0.44, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.27-0.73; for HpaA, OR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.17-0.60]. The subjects with multiple positive specific antibodies at baseline were more likely to be successfully eradicated in a linear fashion (P=0.006).
Our study suggested that total anti- IgG level may serve as a potential monitor of long-term impact on anti- treatment, and priority for treatment may be endowed to the subjects with multiple seropositive antibodies at baseline, especially for FliD and HapA.
为了确定可能预测抗()治疗短期或长期结果的血清生物标志物,在中国临朐县的一项干预试验基础上进行了一项随访研究。
从1803名参与者中随机选取529名受试者,在治疗前以及治疗后1年、2年和7.3年评估总抗免疫球蛋白G(IgG)和10种特异性抗体水平。抗治疗的结果也在治疗后45天和随访结束时的7.3年通过C尿素呼气试验进行平行评估。
我们发现,在根除组中,抗IgG滴度的中位数在7.3年期间一直低于临界值,然而,复发组的中位数在治疗后1年降至1.2,在7.3年时略有上升至2.0。而在根除失败或接受安慰剂的受试者中,中位数显著更高(在2年和7.3年时>3.0)。对于特异性抗体反应,FliD和HpaA的基线血清阳性率与根除失败呈负相关[对于FliD,比值比(OR)=0.44,95%置信区间(95%CI):0.27 - 0.73;对于HpaA,OR = 0.32,95%CI:0.17 - 0.60]。基线时具有多种阳性特异性抗体的受试者更有可能以线性方式成功根除(P = 0.006)。
我们的研究表明,总抗IgG水平可能作为抗治疗长期影响的潜在监测指标,并且对于基线时具有多种血清阳性抗体的受试者,尤其是FliD和HapA,可能赋予治疗优先权。