• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意外手部患者。

The Unexpected Hand Patient.

作者信息

Swiergosz Andrew M, Kasdan Morton L, Wilhelmi Bradon J

机构信息

University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Ky.

出版信息

Eplasty. 2017 May 5;17:e16. eCollection 2017.

PMID:28536645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5424442/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Physicians should be aware of patients trying to obtain a diagnosis for secondary gain. Malingering is a diagnosis that should be suspected when objective findings do not support the subjective symptoms and there is secondary gain.

METHODS

A series of 21 cases are presented that support this position. The charts of 21 patients with a diagnosis of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (chronic regional pain syndrome) and nonanatomic findings were evaluated.

RESULTS

The patients in this series were found to be malingering based on discrepancies between subjective symptoms and objective findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of malingering should be based on thorough history, physical examination, electrodiagnostic studies, imaging studies, and evaluation of all medical records.

摘要

目的

医生应警惕患者为继发获益而寻求诊断。当客观检查结果不支持主观症状且存在继发获益时,应怀疑诈病。

方法

呈现了一系列21例支持这一观点的病例。对21例诊断为反射性交感神经营养不良(慢性区域疼痛综合征)且无解剖学异常发现的患者病历进行了评估。

结果

基于主观症状与客观检查结果之间的差异,发现该系列患者存在诈病行为。

结论

诈病的诊断应基于详尽的病史、体格检查、电诊断检查、影像学检查以及对所有病历的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b1/5424442/619a677845a5/eplasty17e16_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b1/5424442/7f3ef75a2e80/eplasty17e16_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b1/5424442/348a4130d79d/eplasty17e16_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b1/5424442/619a677845a5/eplasty17e16_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b1/5424442/7f3ef75a2e80/eplasty17e16_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b1/5424442/348a4130d79d/eplasty17e16_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b1/5424442/619a677845a5/eplasty17e16_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Unexpected Hand Patient.意外手部患者。
Eplasty. 2017 May 5;17:e16. eCollection 2017.
2
Acceptance of the different denominations for reflex sympathetic dystrophy.对反射性交感神经营养不良不同命名的认可。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Jan;60(1):77-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.1.77.
3
[Complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I). Pathophysiology, diagnostics, and therapy].[Ⅰ型复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS I)。病理生理学、诊断与治疗]
Orthopade. 2003 May;32(5):418-31. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0468-4.
4
Editorial. I have a dream ... reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome - CRPS I) does not exist.社论。我有一个梦想……反射性交感神经营养不良(RSD或复杂性区域疼痛综合征 - CRPS I)并不存在。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013 Jul;38(6):595-7. doi: 10.1177/1753193413477058.
5
Symptom validity testing in medically unexplained pain: a chronic regional pain syndrome type 1 case series.症状有效性测试在医学无法解释的疼痛:一种慢性区域性疼痛综合征 1 型病例系列。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(1):138-47. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.722686. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
6
Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: complex regional pain syndrome type I in children with mitochondrial disease and maternal inheritance.反射性交感神经营养不良:线粒体疾病和母系遗传儿童中的I型复杂性区域疼痛综合征
Arch Dis Child. 2008 May;93(5):390-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.123661. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
7
Is reflex sympathetic dystrophy/complex regional pain syndrome type I a small-fiber neuropathy?I型反射性交感神经营养不良/复杂性区域疼痛综合征是一种小纤维神经病变吗?
Ann Neurol. 2009 Jun;65(6):629-38. doi: 10.1002/ana.21692.
8
Complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I): prospective study and laboratory evaluation.复杂性区域疼痛综合征I(CRPS I):前瞻性研究与实验室评估
Clin J Pain. 1998 Dec;14(4):282-9. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199812000-00003.
9
Complex regional pain syndrome - False hopes and miscommunications.复杂性区域疼痛综合征——虚假的希望和沟通不畅。
Autoimmun Rev. 2019 Mar;18(3):270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.10.003. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
Vascular abnormalities in acute reflex sympathetic dystrophy (CRPS I): complete inhibition of sympathetic nerve activity with recovery.急性反射性交感神经营养不良(CRPS I型)中的血管异常:交感神经活动完全抑制并恢复。
Arch Neurol. 1999 May;56(5):613-20. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.5.613.

引用本文的文献

1
Phalangeal fractures: A retrospective comparison of open reduction and internal fixation vs. closed reduction and percutaneous pinning.指骨骨折:切开复位内固定与闭合复位经皮穿针固定的回顾性比较
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Jul 2;16(4):100124. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100124. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Complex regional pain syndrome.复杂性区域疼痛综合征
Man Ther. 2016 Dec;26:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
2
An important diagnosis for the hand surgeon: "the clenched fist syndrome".手部外科医生的一项重要诊断:“握拳综合征”
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Sep;67(9):1304-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.027. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
Estimated costs of malingered disability.伪装残疾的估计费用。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 Nov;28(7):633-9. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act038. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
4
The clenched fist syndrome revisited.再谈握拳综合征。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Mar;121(3):149e-150e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000300211.32174.56.
5
Physicians being deceived.医生被欺骗。
Pain Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;8(5):433-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00315.x.
6
Malingering pain in the medicolegal context.法医学背景下的诈病性疼痛
Clin J Pain. 2004 Nov-Dec;20(6):423-32. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200411000-00007.
7
Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration.诈病和症状夸大的基础比率。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 Dec;24(8):1094-102. doi: 10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379.
8
Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: misdiagnosis in patients with dysfunctional postures of the upper extremity.反射性交感神经营养不良:上肢功能障碍姿势患者的误诊
J Hand Surg Am. 2000 Nov;25(6):1152-6. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.17867.
9
Truths, errors, and lies around "reflex sympathetic dystrophy" and "complex regional pain syndrome".关于“反射性交感神经营养不良”和“复杂性区域疼痛综合征”的真相、谬误与谎言
J Neurol. 1999 Oct;246(10):875-9. doi: 10.1007/s004150050476.
10
The nocebo effect: do no harm.反安慰剂效应:勿造成伤害。
J South Orthop Assoc. 1999 Summer;8(2):108-13.