Yoon Won Sup, Yang Dae Sik, Lee Jung Ae, Lee Nam Kwon, Park Young Je, Kim Chul Yong, Lee Nak Woo, Hong Jin Hwa, Lee Jae Kwan, Song Jae Yun
Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Gyeonggido, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2917925. doi: 10.1155/2017/2917925. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
. Three nomogram models for early stage uterine cervical cancer have been developed (KROG 13-03 for overall survival [OS], SNUH/AMC for disease-free survival [DFS], and KROG 12-08 for distant metastases-free survival [DMFS]) after radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). This study aimed to validate these models using our cohort with adjuvant radiotherapy. . According to the eligibility criteria of nomogram studies, patients were enrolled in Group A ( = 109) for the two KROG models (RH with PLND and whole pelvic irradiation) and Group B ( = 101) for the SNUH/AMC model (RH with PLND and squamous histology). Using Cox-regression hazard models, the prognostic factors of our cohorts were evaluated. The risk probabilities induced from published nomogram scores were calculated and the concordance indices were evaluated. . Group A had 88.1% 5-year OS and 86.0% 5-year DMFS. Group B had 83.0% 5-year DFS. In multivariate analyses, large tumor size for OS (HR 8.62, < 0.001) and DMFS (HR 5.13, = 0.003), young age (≤40 versus 41-64 years) for OS (HR 4.63, = 0.097) and DFS (HR 3.44, = 0.051), and multiple lymph node metastases (0 versus ≥3) for DMFS (HR 4.03, = 0.031) and DFS (HR 3.90, = 0.038) were significantly correlated. The concordance indices for OS, DMFS, and DFS were 0.612 ( = 0.002), 0.597 ( = 0.014), and 0.587 ( = 0.020), respectively. . The developed nomogram models after RH and PLND are clinically useful in predicting various types of survival with significance.
在根治性子宫切除术(RH)和盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)后,已开发出三种用于早期子宫颈癌的列线图模型(用于总生存期[OS]的KROG 13 - 03、用于无病生存期[DFS]的SNUH/AMC以及用于无远处转移生存期[DMFS]的KROG 12 - 08)。本研究旨在使用我们接受辅助放疗的队列来验证这些模型。 根据列线图研究的纳入标准,患者被纳入A组(n = 109)用于两个KROG模型(RH联合PLND和全盆腔照射),以及B组(n = 101)用于SNUH/AMC模型(RH联合PLND且组织学类型为鳞状)。使用Cox回归风险模型评估我们队列的预后因素。计算从已发表的列线图分数得出的风险概率并评估一致性指数。 A组5年总生存率为88.1%,5年无远处转移生存率为86.0%。B组5年无病生存率为83.0%。在多变量分析中,总生存期(HR 8.62,P < 0.001)和无远处转移生存期(HR 5.13,P = 0.003)的肿瘤大尺寸、总生存期(HR 4.63,P = 0.097)和无病生存期(HR 3.44,P = 0.051)的年轻年龄(≤40岁与41 - 64岁相比)以及无远处转移生存期(HR 4.03,P = 0.031)和无病生存期(HR 3.90,P = 0.038)的多个淋巴结转移(0个与≥3个)显著相关。总生存期、无远处转移生存期和无病生存期的一致性指数分别为0.612(P = 0.002)、0.597(P = 0.014)和0.587(P = 0.020)。 RH和PLND后开发的列线图模型在临床上对预测各种类型的生存期具有重要意义。