Suppr超能文献

在急诊科环境中舒张压降低能否被预测?

Can Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease in Emergency Department Setting be Anticipated?

作者信息

Ayalon-Dangur Irit, Shochat Tzippy, Shiber Shachaf, Grossman Alon

机构信息

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Department of Internal Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2017 Dec;24(4):387-392. doi: 10.1007/s40292-017-0210-7. Epub 2017 May 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are no obvious guidelines for therapy of elevated blood pressure (BP) in the emergency department (ED). Diastolic BP is probably more difficult to control compared with systolic BP.

AIM

To characterize patients who respond with a significant decrease in diastolic BP in the ED, whether treated or not.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, all patients attending a tertiary care ED with elevated BP were evaluated. Clinical characteristics of patients in whom diastolic BP decreased ≥20% were compared with those in whom diastolic BP decreased <20%.

RESULTS

Overall, 391 patients were included in the final analysis (64% females), of which diastolic BP of 106 (27%) patients decreased ≥20%. Patients in whom diastolic BP decreased ≥20% were older (70.1 ± 13 years vs. 65.9 ± 16.7 years, P = 0.011) and had a history of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVA) prior to the ED visit [30 patients (28.3%) vs. 45 patients (15.8%) for a history of IHD, P = 0.005 and 16 patients (15.1%) vs. 21 patients (7.4%) for CVA, P = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

A history of IHD is associated with a higher decrease in diastolic BP irrespective of the use of medical treatment during the ED visit whereas a history of TIA/CVA was associated with a higher decrease in diastolic BP only in patients who were treated in the ED.

摘要

引言

急诊科(ED)中对于血压(BP)升高的治疗尚无明确指南。与收缩压相比,舒张压可能更难控制。

目的

描述在急诊科中舒张压显著下降的患者特征,无论是否接受治疗。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,对所有因血压升高就诊于三级医疗急诊科的患者进行评估。将舒张压下降≥20%的患者的临床特征与舒张压下降<20%的患者进行比较。

结果

总体而言,391例患者纳入最终分析(64%为女性),其中106例(27%)患者的舒张压下降≥20%。舒张压下降≥20%的患者年龄更大(70.1±13岁 vs. 65.9±16.7岁,P = 0.011),且在急诊科就诊前有缺血性心脏病(IHD)和脑血管疾病(CVA)病史[有IHD病史者分别为30例(28.3%) vs. 45例(15.8%),P = 0.005;有CVA病史者分别为16例(15.1%) vs. 21例(7.4%),P = 0.02]。

结论

无论在急诊科就诊期间是否接受药物治疗,IHD病史都与舒张压更高程度的下降相关,而短暂性脑缺血发作/脑血管意外(TIA/CVA)病史仅在急诊科接受治疗的患者中与舒张压更高程度的下降相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验