Ko Sebastian J, OʼBrien Peter J, Guy Pierre, Broekhuyse Henry M, Blachut Piotr A, Lefaivre Kelly A
Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Oct;31(10):559-563. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000886.
To determine the trajectory of recovery after tibial shaft fracture treated with intramedullary nail over the first 5 years and to evaluate the magnitude of the changes in functional outcome at various time intervals.
Prospective cohort study.
A Level 1 trauma center.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-two patients with tibial shaft fracture (OTA 42-A, B, C) were enrolled into the Center's prospective orthopaedic trauma database between January 2005 and February 2010. Functional outcome data were collected at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years.
Enrolled patients were treated acutely with intramedullary nailing of their tibia.
Evaluation was performed using the Short Form-36 and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).
Mean SF-36 physical component scores improved between 6 and 12 months (P = 0.0008) and between 1 and 5 years (P = 0.0029). Similarly, mean SMFA dysfunction index scores improved between 6 and 12 months (P = 0.0254) and between 1 and 5 years (P = 0.0106). In both scores, the rate or slope of this improvement is flatter between 1 and 5 years than it is between 6 and 12 months. Furthermore, SF-36 and SMFA scores did not reach baseline at 5 years (SF-36 P < 0.0001, SMFA P = 0.0026). A significant proportion of patients were still achieving a minimal clinically important difference in function between 1 and 5 years (SF-36 = 54%, SMFA = 44%).
The trajectory of functional recovery after tibial shaft fracture is characterized by an initial decline in function, followed by improvement between 6 and 12 months. There is still further improvement beyond 1 year, but this is of flatter trajectory. The 5-year results indicate that function does not improve to baseline by 5 years after injury.
Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
确定髓内钉治疗胫骨干骨折后最初5年的恢复轨迹,并评估不同时间间隔功能结局变化的程度。
前瞻性队列研究。
一级创伤中心。
患者/参与者:2005年1月至2010年2月期间,132例胫骨干骨折(OTA 42-A、B、C型)患者被纳入该中心的前瞻性骨科创伤数据库。在基线、6个月、1年和5年时收集功能结局数据。
纳入的患者接受胫骨急性髓内钉固定治疗。
使用简明健康调查36项量表(Short Form-36,SF-36)和简短肌肉骨骼功能评估(Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment,SMFA)进行评估。
SF-36身体成分评分在6至12个月之间(P = 0.0008)以及1至5年之间(P = 0.0029)有所改善。同样,SMFA功能障碍指数评分在6至12个月之间(P = 0.0254)以及1至5年之间(P = 0.0106)有所改善。在这两个评分中,1至5年期间这种改善的速率或斜率比6至12个月期间更平缓。此外,5年时SF-36和SMFA评分未恢复到基线水平(SF-36 P < 0.0001,SMFA P = 0.0026)。相当一部分患者在1至5年期间功能仍有最小临床重要差异(SF-36 = 54%,SMFA = 44%)。
胫骨干骨折后功能恢复轨迹的特点是功能最初下降,随后在6至12个月之间改善。1年后仍有进一步改善,但轨迹更平缓。5年结果表明,受伤后5年功能未恢复到基线水平。
预后IV级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。