Bidet Philippe, Tran Quang Violaine, Yagusky Pablo, Birgy André, Bonacorsi Stéphane, Basmaci Romain
IAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Service de Microbiologie, Hôpital Robert-Debré, AP-HP, Centre National de Référence associé Escherichia coli, Paris, France.
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Aug;55(8):2422-2430. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00271-17. Epub 2017 May 24.
Outbreaks of invasive infections have recently been reported in day care centers. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) revealed that although the invasive strains had widespread dissemination in the day care population, less virulent strains were also circulating in the facilities. However, these typing tools are costly, time-consuming, and labor-intensive and provide delayed results. A study was conducted to assess the performance of a rapid and cost-effective genotyping tool targeting the DNA uptake sequence (DUS) in the investigation of outbreaks of disease. DUS typing (DUST) patterns of each strain from 7 different clusters were compared to distinguish genotypically linked strains from others. PFGE and, when available, MLST results were used as gold standards. DUST was assessed on 80 isolates from Nir-Itzhak ( = 14), Tel-Nof ( = 14), Palmahim ( = 5), Umm-al-Fahm ( = 7), Eilat ( = 8), Nevatim ( = 15) in Israel and Paris, France ( = 17). A unique DUST pattern was involved in the Nir-Itzhak, Palmahim, Umm-al-Fahm, and Paris episodes. Two DUST patterns were found in Eilat, whereas at least 3 were identified in the Tel-Nof and Nevatim episodes. In total, 11 (13.8%) children carried a isolate that differed from the outbreak strain. These results were concordant with those obtained with the traditional PFGE and MLST methods. DUST appears to be sensitive and specific in distinguishing the invasive outbreak strain from others in asymptomatic carriers and could be useful to limit unnecessary exposure of the entire day care population to selective antibiotic pressure.
近期有报道称日托中心出现侵袭性感染疫情。脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)和多位点序列分型(MLST)显示,尽管侵袭性菌株在日托人群中广泛传播,但毒力较低的菌株也在这些场所中循环。然而,这些分型工具成本高、耗时且 labor-intensive ,并提供延迟结果。进行了一项研究,以评估一种针对 DNA 摄取序列(DUS)的快速且经济高效的基因分型工具在疾病暴发调查中的性能。比较了来自7个不同集群的每个菌株的 DUS 分型(DUST)模式,以从其他菌株中区分出基因连锁的菌株。PFGE以及(如有可用)MLST结果用作金标准。对来自以色列的 Nir-Itzhak(= 14)、Tel-Nof(= 14)、Palmahim(= 5)、Umm-al-Fahm(= 7)、埃拉特(= 8)、内瓦蒂姆(= 15)以及法国巴黎(= 17)的80株分离株进行了 DUST 评估。Nir-Itzhak、Palmahim、Umm-al-Fahm和巴黎的疫情涉及一种独特的 DUST 模式。在埃拉特发现了两种 DUST 模式,而在 Tel-Nof 和内瓦蒂姆的疫情中至少鉴定出三种。总共有11名(13.8%)儿童携带的分离株与暴发菌株不同。这些结果与传统 PFGE 和 MLST 方法获得的结果一致。DUST 在区分无症状携带者中的侵袭性暴发菌株与其他菌株方面似乎具有敏感性和特异性,并且可能有助于限制整个日托人群受到选择性抗生素压力的不必要暴露。