Suppr超能文献

靶向抗原呈递细胞的慢病毒载体不支持有效的T细胞效应反应的发展:对体内靶向疫苗递送的启示。

Antigen-presenting cell-targeted lentiviral vectors do not support the development of productive T-cell effector responses: implications for in vivo targeted vaccine delivery.

作者信息

Goyvaerts C, De Vlaeminck Y, Escors D, Lienenklaus S, Keyaerts M, Raes G, Breckpot K

机构信息

Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Therapy (LMCT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Immunomodulation, Navarrabiomed, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

Gene Ther. 2017 Jun;24(6):370-375. doi: 10.1038/gt.2017.30. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

Targeting transgene expression specifically to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) has been put forward as a promising strategy to direct the immune system towards immunity. We developed the nanobody-display technology to restrict the tropism of lentiviral vectors (LVs) to APCs. However, we observed that immunization with APC-targeted LVs (DC2.1-LVs) did not evoke strong antigen-specific T-cell immunity when compared to immunization with broad tropism LVs (VSV.G-LVs). In this study, we report that VSV.G-LVs are more immunogenic than DC2.1-LVs because they transduce stromal cells, which has a role in activating antigen-specific T cells. Moreover, VSV.G-LVs trigger a pro-inflammatory innate immune response through transduction of APCs and stromal cells, while DC2.1-LVs trigger a type I interferon response with anti-viral capacity. These findings question the rationale of targeting LVs to APCs and argue for the development of VSV.G-LVs with an improved safety profile.

摘要

将转基因表达特异性靶向抗原呈递细胞(APC)已被提出作为引导免疫系统产生免疫的一种有前景的策略。我们开发了纳米抗体展示技术,以将慢病毒载体(LV)的嗜性限制在APC上。然而,我们观察到,与用广泛嗜性LV(VSV.G-LV)免疫相比,用靶向APC的LV(DC2.1-LV)免疫并未引发强烈的抗原特异性T细胞免疫。在本研究中,我们报告VSV.G-LV比DC2.1-LV更具免疫原性,因为它们能转导基质细胞,而基质细胞在激活抗原特异性T细胞中起作用。此外,VSV.G-LV通过转导APC和基质细胞引发促炎性先天性免疫反应,而DC2.1-LV引发具有抗病毒能力的I型干扰素反应。这些发现质疑了将LV靶向APC的基本原理,并支持开发具有更好安全性的VSV.G-LV。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验