Suppr超能文献

受训者在性少数群体客户治疗中使用督导:一项定性研究。

Trainees' use of supervision for therapy with sexual minority clients: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park.

出版信息

J Couns Psychol. 2018 Jan;65(1):36-50. doi: 10.1037/cou0000232. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

In the supervision literature, research on sexual orientation considerations often focuses on sexual minority supervisees and less often on their work with sexual minority clients. Yet both heterosexual and sexual minority supervisees serve sexual minority clients and may have different supervision needs. Twelve predoctoral interns from 12 APA-accredited counseling center internships were interviewed about how they made use of supervision for their work with a sexual minority client. The sample consisted of 6 heterosexual-identified supervisees and 6 supervisees who identified as lesbian, gay, or queer (LGQ). Data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research. All participants reported positive gains from supervision that carried over to their work with heterosexual and sexual minority clients, even when not all supervisors disclosed or discussed their own sexual orientation. Heterosexual supervisees used supervision to ensure that their heterosexuality does not interfere with an affirmative experience for their sexual minority client, whereas LGQ supervisees used supervision to explore differences in sexual identity development between themselves and their client to minimize the negative impact of overidentification. Thus, affirmative supervision may unfold with different foci depending on supervisees' sexual identity. Implications for training and supervision are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

在监督文献中,关于性取向考虑的研究通常集中在性少数监督对象上,而较少关注他们与性少数客户的工作。然而,异性恋和性少数监督对象都为性少数客户服务,并且可能有不同的监督需求。对来自 12 个 APA 认可的咨询中心实习项目的 12 名博士生实习生进行了采访,了解他们如何利用监督来为性少数客户提供服务。样本包括 6 名异性恋认同的监督对象和 6 名认同自己是女同性恋、男同性恋或酷儿(LGQ)的监督对象。使用共识定性研究方法对数据进行了分析。所有参与者都报告说,从监督中获得了积极的收益,这些收益会影响到他们与异性恋和性少数客户的工作,即使并非所有的监督者都公开或讨论自己的性取向。异性恋监督对象利用监督来确保他们的异性恋不会干扰他们的性少数客户的积极体验,而 LGQ 监督对象则利用监督来探讨他们自己和客户之间的性身份发展差异,以尽量减少过度认同的负面影响。因此,肯定性监督可能会根据监督对象的性身份而有不同的重点。讨论了培训和监督的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验