a Griffith Business School, Menzies Health Institute Queensland , Griffith University , Gold Coast , Australia.
b Griffith Business School , Griffith University , Gold Coast , Australia.
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Aug;22(8):990-998. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1330873. Epub 2017 May 25.
To identify feasible models of intergenerational care programmes, that is, care of children and older people in a shared setting, to determine consumer preferences and willingness to pay.
Feasible models were constructed in extensive consultations with a panel of experts using a Delphi technique (n = 23) and were considered based on their practical implementation within an Australian setting. This informed a survey tool that captured the preferences and willingness to pay for these models by potential consumers, when compared to the status quo. Information collected from the surveys (n = 816) was analysed using regression analysis to identify fundamental drivers of preferences and the prices consumers were willing to pay for intergenerational care programmes.
The shared campus and visiting models were identified as feasible intergenerational care models. Key attributes of these models included respite day care; a common educational pedagogy across generations; screening; monitoring; and evaluation of participant outcomes. Although parents were more likely to take up intergenerational care compared to the status quo, adult carers reported a higher willingness to pay for these services. Educational attainment also influenced the likely uptake of intergenerational care.
The results of this study show that there is demand for the shared campus and the visiting campus models among the Australian community. The findings support moves towards consumer-centric models of care, in line with national and international best practice. This consumer-centric approach is encapsulated in the intergenerational care model and enables greater choice of care to match different consumer demands.
确定代际关怀计划的可行模式,即在共享环境中照顾儿童和老年人,以确定消费者的偏好和支付意愿。
通过德尔菲技术(n=23)与专家小组进行广泛协商,构建可行的模式,并根据其在澳大利亚环境中的实际实施情况进行考虑。这为调查工具提供了信息,该工具通过与现状进行比较,捕获了潜在消费者对这些模式的偏好和支付意愿。从调查中收集的信息(n=816)使用回归分析进行分析,以确定偏好的基本驱动因素以及消费者愿意为代际关怀计划支付的价格。
确定共享校园和访问模式为可行的代际关怀模式。这些模式的关键属性包括临时日托;代际共同的教育教学法;筛查;监测;和参与者结果的评估。尽管父母比现状更有可能接受代际关怀,但成年照顾者表示愿意为这些服务支付更高的费用。教育程度也影响代际关怀的可能接受程度。
本研究结果表明,澳大利亚社会对共享校园和访问校园模式有需求。调查结果支持以消费者为中心的护理模式,符合国家和国际最佳实践。这种以消费者为中心的方法包含在代际关怀模式中,并能够提供更多的护理选择,以满足不同消费者的需求。