Yue Mu, Li Jialiang
Int J Biostat. 2017 May 18;13(1):/j/ijb.2017.13.issue-1/ijb-2017-0024/ijb-2017-0024.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0024.
Motivated by risk prediction studies with ultra-high dimensional bio markers, we propose a novel improvement screening methodology. Accurate risk prediction can be quite useful for patient treatment selection, prevention strategy or disease management in evidence-based medicine. The question of how to choose new markers in addition to the conventional ones is especially important. In the past decade, a number of new measures for quantifying the added value from the new markers were proposed, among which the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) stand out. Meanwhile, C-statistics are routinely used to quantify the capacity of the estimated risk score in discriminating among subjects with different event times. In this paper, we will examine these improvement statistics as well as the norm-based approach for evaluating the incremental values of new markers and compare these four measures by analyzing ultra-high dimensional censored survival data. In particular, we consider Cox proportional hazards models with varying coefficients. All measures perform very well in simulations and we illustrate our methods in an application to a lung cancer study.
受超高维生物标志物风险预测研究的启发,我们提出了一种新颖的改进筛选方法。在循证医学中,准确的风险预测对于患者治疗选择、预防策略或疾病管理非常有用。除了传统标志物外,如何选择新的标志物这一问题尤为重要。在过去十年中,人们提出了许多用于量化新标志物附加值的新方法,其中综合判别改善(IDI)和净重新分类改善(NRI)最为突出。同时,C统计量通常用于量化估计风险评分在区分不同事件时间的受试者方面的能力。在本文中,我们将研究这些改善统计量以及用于评估新标志物增量值的基于规范的方法,并通过分析超高维删失生存数据来比较这四种方法。特别是,我们考虑具有变化系数的Cox比例风险模型。所有方法在模拟中表现都非常出色,并且我们在一项肺癌研究的应用中展示了我们的方法。