Balkus Jennifer E, Palanee-Phillips Thesla, Reddy Krishnaveni, Siva Samantha, Harkoo Ishana, Nakabiito Clemensia, Kintu Kenneth, Nair Gonasangrie, Chappell Catherine, Kiweewa Flavia Matovu, Kabwigu Samuel, Naidoo Logashvari, Jeenarain Nitesha, Marzinke Mark, Soto-Torres Lydia, Brown Elizabeth R, Baeten Jared M
*Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Departments of †Epidemiology; ‡Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; §Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa; ‖South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa; ¶CAPRISA, Durban, South Africa; #Makerere University - Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda; **Emavundleni Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa; ††Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA; ‡‡Departments of Pathology and Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; §§US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and Departments of ‖‖Biostatistics; ¶¶Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Oct 1;76(2):e47-e51. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001455.
To evaluate the potential for a clinically relevant drug-drug interaction with concomitant use of a dapivirine vaginal ring, a novel antiretroviral-based HIV-1 prevention strategy, and hormonal contraception by examining contraceptive efficacies with and without dapivirine ring use.
A secondary analysis of women participating in MTN-020/ASPIRE, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the dapivirine vaginal ring for HIV-1 prevention.
Use of a highly effective method of contraception was an eligibility criterion for study participation. Urine pregnancy tests were performed monthly. Pregnancy incidence by arm was calculated separately for each hormonal contraceptive method and compared using an Andersen-Gill proportional hazards model stratified by site and censored at HIV-1 infection.
Of 2629 women enrolled, 2310 women returned for follow-up and reported using a hormonal contraceptive method at any point during study participation (1139 in the dapivirine arm and 1171 in the placebo arm). Pregnancy incidence in the dapivirine arm versus placebo among women using injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate was 0.43% vs. 0.54%, among women using injectable norethisterone enanthate was 1.15% vs. 0%, among women using hormonal implants was 0.22% vs. 0.69%, and among women using oral contraceptive pills was 32.26% vs. 28.01%. Pregnancy incidence did not differ by study arm for any of the hormonal contraceptive methods.
Use of the dapivirine ring does not reduce the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives for pregnancy prevention. Oral contraceptive pill use was associated with high pregnancy incidence, potentially because of poor pill adherence. Injectable and implantable methods were highly effective in preventing pregnancy.
通过检查使用和不使用达匹韦林阴道环时的避孕效果,评估一种新型基于抗逆转录病毒的HIV-1预防策略——达匹韦林阴道环与激素避孕同时使用时发生临床相关药物相互作用的可能性。
对参与MTN-020/ASPIRE研究的女性进行二次分析,MTN-020/ASPIRE是一项关于达匹韦林阴道环预防HIV-1的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
使用高效避孕方法是参与研究的入选标准。每月进行尿妊娠试验。针对每种激素避孕方法,分别计算各治疗组的妊娠发生率,并使用按地点分层且在HIV-1感染时进行截尾的Andersen-Gill比例风险模型进行比较。
在2629名登记的女性中,2310名女性返回进行随访,并报告在研究参与期间的任何时间使用激素避孕方法(达匹韦林组1139名,安慰剂组1171名)。使用醋酸甲羟孕酮长效注射剂的女性中,达匹韦林组与安慰剂组的妊娠发生率分别为0.43%和0.54%;使用庚酸炔诺酮注射剂的女性中,分别为1.15%和0%;使用激素植入剂的女性中,分别为0.22%和0.69%;使用口服避孕药的女性中,分别为32.26%和28.01%。对于任何一种激素避孕方法,各治疗组的妊娠发生率均无差异。
使用达匹韦林环不会降低激素避孕预防妊娠的效果。口服避孕药的妊娠发生率较高,可能是因为服药依从性差。注射和植入方法在预防妊娠方面非常有效。