Department of Nursing, Jen-Teh Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Shalunhu, Houlong Township, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Department of Nursing, Oriental Institute of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):e138-e146. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13890. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
To explore decisional conflict and its influencing factors on choosing dialysis modality in patients with end-stage renal diseases. The influencing factors investigated include demographics, predialysis education, dialysis knowledge, decision self-efficacy and social support.
Making dialysis modality decisions can be challenging for patients with end-stage renal diseases; there are pros and cons to both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Patients are often uncertain as to which one will be the best alternative for them. This decisional conflict increases the likelihood of making a decision that is not based on the patient's values or preferences and may result in undesirable postdecisional consequences. Addressing factors predisposing patients to decisional conflict helps to facilitate informed decision-making and then to improve healthcare quality.
A predictive correlational cross-sectional study design was used.
Seventy patients were recruited from the outpatient dialysis clinics of two general hospitals in Taiwan. Data were collected with study questionnaires, including questions on demographics, dialysis modality and predialysis education, the Dialysis Knowledge Scale, the Decision Self-Efficacy scale, the Social Support Scale, and the Decisional Conflict Scale.
The mean score on the Decisional Conflict Scale was 29.26 (SD = 22.18). Decision self-efficacy, dialysis modality, predialysis education, professional support and dialysis knowledge together explained 76.4% of the variance in decisional conflict.
Individuals who had lower decision self-efficacy, did not receive predialysis education on both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, had lower dialysis knowledge and perceived lower professional support reported higher decisional conflict on choosing dialysis modality.
When providing decisional support to predialysis stage patients, practitioners need to increase patients' decision self-efficacy, provide both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis predialysis education, increase dialysis knowledge and provide professional support.
探讨终末期肾病患者在选择透析方式时的决策冲突及其影响因素。调查的影响因素包括人口统计学、透析前教育、透析知识、决策自我效能感和社会支持。
对于终末期肾病患者来说,做出透析方式的决策可能具有挑战性;血液透析和腹膜透析都有各自的优缺点。患者往往不确定哪种方法最适合他们。这种决策冲突增加了做出不符合患者价值观或偏好的决策的可能性,可能导致决策后不理想的后果。解决导致患者决策冲突的因素有助于促进知情决策,进而提高医疗质量。
采用预测性相关横断面研究设计。
从台湾两家综合医院的门诊透析诊所招募了 70 名患者。使用研究问卷收集数据,包括人口统计学、透析方式和透析前教育、透析知识量表、决策自我效能感量表、社会支持量表和决策冲突量表的问题。
决策冲突量表的平均得分为 29.26(SD=22.18)。决策自我效能感、透析方式、透析前教育、专业支持和透析知识共同解释了决策冲突的 76.4%。
决策自我效能感较低、未接受血液透析和腹膜透析的透析前教育、透析知识较低且感知专业支持较低的个体,在选择透析方式时报告的决策冲突更高。
在为透析前阶段的患者提供决策支持时,从业者需要提高患者的决策自我效能感,提供血液透析和腹膜透析的透析前教育,增加透析知识并提供专业支持。