Connors Kristin A, Dyer Scott D, Belanger Scott E
Procter & Gamble, Mason Business Center, Mason, Ohio, USA.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Jul;36(7):1697-1703. doi: 10.1002/etc.3829. Epub 2017 May 24.
Investigations into the environmental fate and effects of microplastics have been gaining momentum. Small, insoluble polymeric particles are implicated by scientists in a wide variety of studies that are used to suggest a potential for widespread impacts in freshwater and marine pelagic and sediment environments. An exponential growth in scientific publications and an increase in regulatory attention have occurred. However, despite these efforts, the environmental hazard of these particles is still unknown. To evaluate the hazard of microplastics within a risk assessment context, we need a way to evaluate the quality of experimental studies. We performed a thorough review of the quality and focus of environmental microplastic research, to understand the methodologies employed and how this may assist or distract from the ability of environmental risk assessors to evaluate microplastics. We provide guidance to improve the reliability and relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory and broader environmental assessments. Nine areas of needed improvement are identified and discussed. Important data gaps and experimental limitations are highlighted. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:1697-1703. © 2017 SETAC.
对微塑料的环境归宿和影响的调查一直在加速推进。科学家们在各种各样的研究中涉及到这些微小的、不溶性的聚合物颗粒,这些研究表明微塑料有可能对淡水和海洋的远洋及沉积物环境产生广泛影响。科学出版物呈指数级增长,监管关注度也有所提高。然而,尽管做出了这些努力,这些颗粒的环境危害仍然未知。为了在风险评估背景下评估微塑料的危害,我们需要一种方法来评估实验研究的质量。我们对环境微塑料研究的质量和重点进行了全面审查,以了解所采用的方法,以及这可能如何帮助或干扰环境风险评估人员评估微塑料的能力。我们提供指导,以提高生态毒理学研究对于监管和更广泛环境评估的可靠性和相关性。确定并讨论了九个需要改进的领域。突出了重要的数据差距和实验局限性。《环境毒理学与化学》2017年;36:1697 - 1703。© 2017 SETAC。