• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第三代药物洗脱支架在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有患者群体中的安全性和有效性结果:e-Biomatrix法国注册研究的12个月和24个月结果

Safety and efficacy outcomes of 3rd generation DES in an all-comer population of patients undergoing PCI: 12-month and 24-month results of the e-Biomatrix French registry.

作者信息

Maupas Eric, Lipiecki Janusz, Levy Raphy, Faurie Benjamin, Karsenty Bernard, Moulichon Marc Eric, Brunelle François, Maillard Luc, de Poli Fabien, Lefèvre Thierry

机构信息

Clinique Les Franciscaines, Nîmes, France.

Pôle Santé République, Clermont Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 15;90(6):890-897. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27081. Epub 2017 May 22.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.27081
PMID:28544186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5724651/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The French Ebiomatrix registry aimed to confirm the results of the Leaders trial in an all-comer population in France.

BACKGROUND

The Leaders trial showed the Biolimus-eluting-sent (BES) to be equivalent to the Cypher stent in terms of safety and efficacy at 1 year and superior regarding stent thrombosis after 1 year.

METHODS

BES recipients were enrolled in 42 French centers with up to 24-month clinical follow up.

RESULTS

2365 patients were included. Mean age: 65.7 ±11.2 years, 76.1% males, 31.8% had diabetes, 36.5% ACS (28.7% non-ST-elevation MI and 7.8% with ST-elevation MI). 1.7 ± 1.0 stents/patient were implanted and procedural success was 99.5%. 12-month follow-up was completed in 94.3% patients and 24 months in 91.4%. MACCE rates at 12 and 24 months were 5.8% and 9% (all cause-death 1.5% and 2.2%; stent thrombosis definite/probable 0.4% and 0.6%), respectively. MACCE were not significantly higher in diabetic patients compared with non-diabetics but cardiac death was higher (1.6% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.01 at 1 year and 1.9% vs. 0.6, P = 0.005 at 2 years) as was stent thrombosis (0.9% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.009 and 1.2 vs. 0.3% P = 0.008). Compared with non-ACS patients, MACCE was significantly higher in the ACS subgroup (7.5% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.001 at 1 year and 10.3% vs.8.1%, P = 0.07 at 2 years).

CONCLUSION

In this large real-world registry, the BES with biodegradable polymer showed excellent acute and mid-term outcomes with a 5.8% and 9% rate of MACCE at one and 2 years and a very low rate of stent thrombosis between 1 and 2 years (0.2%), thus demonstrating the replicability of the LEADERS trial in a registry population. © 2017 The Authors Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

目的

法国Ebiomatrix注册研究旨在在法国所有患者群体中证实Leaders试验的结果。

背景

Leaders试验表明,生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架(BES)在1年时的安全性和有效性与Cypher支架相当,且在1年后支架血栓形成方面更具优势。

方法

BES植入患者入组法国42个中心,进行长达24个月的临床随访。

结果

纳入2365例患者。平均年龄:65.7±11.2岁,男性占76.1%,31.8%患有糖尿病,36.5%为急性冠状动脉综合征(28.7%为非ST段抬高型心肌梗死,7.8%为ST段抬高型心肌梗死)。每位患者植入1.7±1.0枚支架,手术成功率为99.5%。94.3%的患者完成了12个月随访,91.4%的患者完成了24个月随访。12个月和24个月时主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)发生率分别为5.8%和9%(全因死亡分别为1.5%和2.2%;明确/可能的支架血栓形成分别为0.4%和0.6%)。与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的MACCE发生率无显著更高,但心脏性死亡更高(1年时为1.6%对0.6%,P = 0.01;2年时为1.9%对0.6%,P = 0.005),支架血栓形成情况也是如此(0.9%对0.2%,P = 0.009;1.2%对0.3%,P = 0.008)。与非急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者相比,ACS亚组的MACCE发生率显著更高(1年时为7.5%对4.8%,P = 0.001;2年时为10.3%对8.1%,P = 0.07)。

结论

在这项大型真实世界注册研究中,具有可生物降解聚合物的BES显示出优异的急性和中期结果,1年和2年时MACCE发生率分别为5.8%和9%,1至2年期间支架血栓形成发生率极低(0.2%),从而证明了Leaders试验在注册研究人群中的可重复性。©2017作者。导管插入术和心血管介入。由Wiley Periodicals, Inc.出版

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eb8/5724651/33f1da8bc678/CCD-90-890-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eb8/5724651/d0bb58c7c929/CCD-90-890-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eb8/5724651/51f9fe4eca3a/CCD-90-890-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eb8/5724651/33f1da8bc678/CCD-90-890-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eb8/5724651/d0bb58c7c929/CCD-90-890-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eb8/5724651/51f9fe4eca3a/CCD-90-890-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eb8/5724651/33f1da8bc678/CCD-90-890-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy outcomes of 3rd generation DES in an all-comer population of patients undergoing PCI: 12-month and 24-month results of the e-Biomatrix French registry.第三代药物洗脱支架在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有患者群体中的安全性和有效性结果:e-Biomatrix法国注册研究的12个月和24个月结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 15;90(6):890-897. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27081. Epub 2017 May 22.
2
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
3
First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial.第一代与第二代药物洗脱支架治疗分叉病变:LEADERS全人群随机试验的5年随访
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;87(7):E248-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26344. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
4
Real-life clinical outcomes with everolimus eluting platinum chromium stent with an abluminal biodegradable polymer in patients from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR).来自瑞典冠状动脉造影和血管成形术登记处(SCAAR)的患者使用载有依维莫司的铂铬合金支架及管腔外可生物降解聚合物的实际临床结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 15;90(6):881-887. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27030. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Outcomes following implantation of the Biolimus A9-eluting BioMatrix coronary stent: Primary analysis of the e-BioMatrix registry.生物雷帕霉素A9洗脱型BioMatrix冠状动脉支架植入后的结果:e-BioMatrix注册研究的初步分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 1;86(7):1151-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25892. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
6
Three-year patient-related and stent-related outcomes of second-generation everolimus-eluting Xience V stents versus zotarolimus-eluting resolute stents in real-world practice (from the Multicenter Prospective EXCELLENT and RESOLUTE-Korea Registries).在真实临床实践中(来自多中心前瞻性EXCELLENT和RESOLUTE - 韩国注册研究),第二代依维莫司洗脱Xience V支架与佐他莫司洗脱Resolute支架的三年患者相关及支架相关结局对比
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 1;114(9):1329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.065. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
7
Clinical outcomes with Biolimus (A9)™ eluting stent, 'BioMatrix' in diabetic patients--interim results from multicenter post market surveillance registry in India.生物雷帕霉素(A9)™洗脱支架“BioMatrix”在糖尿病患者中的临床结果——来自印度多中心上市后监测注册研究的中期结果
Indian Heart J. 2013 Sep-Oct;65(5):586-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
8
Safety and efficacy profile of bioresorbable-polylactide-polymer-biolimus-A9-eluting stents versus durable-polymer-everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.生物可吸收聚丙交酯聚合物生物雷帕霉素 A9 洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司和佐他莫司洗脱支架在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的安全性和有效性概况。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 15;88(6):E173-E182. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26617. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
9
Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents at One-Year Follow-Up: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.一年随访期内生物可降解聚合物生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的比较:一项基于注册登记的队列研究。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2016 Apr 1;43(2):126-30. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4997. eCollection 2016 Apr.
10
The three year follow-up of the randomised "all-comers" trial of a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus permanent polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (LEADERS).生物可降解聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与永久性聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(LEADERS)随机“所有患者”试验的 3 年随访结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Nov;7(7):789-95. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I7A125.

引用本文的文献

1
In-Hospital and 1-Year Clinical Results from the French Registry Using Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Coronary Artery Disease.法国注册研究中急性冠脉综合征和稳定型冠心病患者使用无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的院内和 1 年临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Dec 13;2023:8907315. doi: 10.1155/2023/8907315. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions in Large Vessels: A Study-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗大血管初发冠状动脉病变的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的研究水平荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Dec;38(6):1375-1384. doi: 10.1007/s10557-023-07526-0. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
One-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a propensity score comparison of patients enrolled in the ABSORB EXTEND and SPIRIT trials.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗患者的 1 年临床结果:ABSORB EXTEND 和 SPIRIT 试验中入组患者的倾向评分比较。
EuroIntervention. 2016 Nov 20;12(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I10A206.
2
Efficacy and safety of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent: the EVOLVE II Randomized Trial.新型生物可吸收聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的疗效与安全性:EVOLVE II随机试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;8(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002372.
3
Randomized comparison of 9-month stent strut coverage of biolimus and everolimus drug-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Long-term (5-years) clinical follow-up (ROBUST trial).在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,通过光学相干断层扫描对生物雷帕霉素和依维莫司药物洗脱支架9个月支架小梁覆盖率进行随机比较。长期(5年)临床随访(ROBUST试验)。
Cardiol J. 2023 Mar 10;30(6):921-8. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2023.0013.
4
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in CAD patients: A comparison of major adverse cardiovascular events of second- and third-generation drug-eluting stents.冠心病患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:第二代与第三代药物洗脱支架主要不良心血管事件的比较
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 16;13:900798. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.900798. eCollection 2022.
5
Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study).前瞻性、单中心评估在稳定型冠心病患者(SCRAP 研究)中根据提出无支架策略的决策树进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1164-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02054-7. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
6
First clinical evidence characterizing safety and efficacy of the new CoCr Biolimus-A9 eluting stent: The Biomatrix Alpha™ registry.首个描述新型钴铬生物雷帕霉素A9洗脱支架安全性和有效性的临床证据:Biomatrix Alpha™注册研究。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jan 27;26:100472. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100472. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
The () Allelic Variant Is Independently Associated With Clopidogrel Treatment Outcome.()等位基因变异与氯吡格雷治疗结果独立相关。
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2019 Oct 21;12:287-295. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S222212. eCollection 2019.
8
Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a single-center study.可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架与第二代药物洗脱支架在糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者中的应用:一项单中心研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Aug 14;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0758-0.
Outcomes following implantation of the Biolimus A9-eluting BioMatrix coronary stent: Primary analysis of the e-BioMatrix registry.生物雷帕霉素A9洗脱型BioMatrix冠状动脉支架植入后的结果:e-BioMatrix注册研究的初步分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 1;86(7):1151-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25892. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
4
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
5
2-year patient-related versus stent-related outcomes: the SORT OUT IV (Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome IV) Trial.2 年患者相关与支架相关结局:SORT OUT IV 试验(斯堪的纳维亚随机临床试验组织与临床结局 IV 期)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 25;60(13):1140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
6
Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the COMFORTABLE AMI randomized trial.载有生物可吸收聚合物的依维莫司洗脱支架与金属裸支架对急性心肌梗死患者心血管事件的影响:COMFORTABLE AMI 随机试验。
JAMA. 2012 Aug 22;308(8):777-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.10065.
7
Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架的支架血栓形成:来自综合网络荟萃分析的证据。
Lancet. 2012 Apr 14;379(9824):1393-402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60324-9. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
8
One-year outcomes of patients with the zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent: RESOLUTE International Registry.载有佐他莫司药物涂层冠状动脉支架的患者一年随访结果:RESOLUTE 国际注册研究。
EuroIntervention. 2012 Feb;7(10):1181-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I10A189.
9
Clinical performance of a drug-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer in an unselected patient population: the NOBORI 2 study.在未选择患者人群中,载药可降解聚合物涂层支架的临床疗效:NOBORI 2 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2012 May 15;8(1):109-16. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I1A17.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease (LEADERS): 4 year follow-up of a randomised non-inferiority trial.在冠心病患者中,可生物降解聚合物比索洛尔洗脱支架与持久性聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的长期临床结果(LEADERS):随机非劣效试验的 4 年随访。
Lancet. 2011 Dec 3;378(9807):1940-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61672-3. Epub 2011 Nov 8.