Minacapelli Alberto, Piraino Davide, Buccheri Dario, Cortese Bernardo
Interventional cardiology, Paolo Giaccone Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Interventional cardiology, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milano, Italy.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul;92(1):E20-E27. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26957. Epub 2017 May 22.
After the introduction of drug eluting stent (DES) the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has decreased if compared to the BMS era; however, treatment of patients with ISR remained a major issue for the interventional cardiologist. DES has been largely used with good results also as second layer for the treatment of ISR, but the overall percentage of patients suffering from restenosis still remains high, especially in some subgroups of patients as ones with diabetes mellitus (DM). In this clinical scenario, drug coated balloon (DCB) has been gaining an important role for the treatment of ISR. In fact, it allows to release an antiproliferative drug, namely paclitaxel, without the addition of a second metallic strut, which can lead to a persistent inflammatory stimulus and further narrow the vessel. This could be an advantage in patients with an already increased systemic inflammatory burden and stiffer vessels as those with DM. Despite differences in terms of efficacy and safety between DES and DCB have already been evaluated in different clinical trials, just few of these focused on diabetic patients. The aim of this paper is to review the available data for treatment of ISR both with DES, DCB, and a comparison between these two devices, in patients affected by DM. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
与裸金属支架(BMS)时代相比,药物洗脱支架(DES)引入后支架内再狭窄(ISR)的发生率有所降低;然而,对于介入心脏病学家来说,ISR患者的治疗仍然是一个主要问题。DES也大量用于治疗ISR的第二层且效果良好,但再狭窄患者的总体比例仍然很高,尤其是在一些患者亚组中,如糖尿病(DM)患者。在这种临床情况下,药物涂层球囊(DCB)在ISR治疗中发挥着重要作用。事实上,它可以释放一种抗增殖药物,即紫杉醇,而无需添加第二个金属支架,后者可能导致持续的炎症刺激并进一步使血管变窄。对于像DM患者这样全身炎症负担已经增加且血管更僵硬的患者来说,这可能是一个优势。尽管DES和DCB在疗效和安全性方面的差异已经在不同的临床试验中进行了评估,但其中很少有针对糖尿病患者的。本文的目的是回顾DM患者使用DES和DCB治疗ISR的现有数据,以及这两种器械之间的比较。© 2017威利期刊公司