De Ridder Dirk, Perera Sanjaya, Vanneste Sven
Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Laboratory for Clinical & Integrative Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Neuromodulation. 2017 Oct;20(7):650-653. doi: 10.1111/ner.12614. Epub 2017 May 25.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is routinely used for intractable pain syndromes. For SCS to be efficacious the painful area needs to be covered by SCS induced paresthesia symptoms. Recently, novel stimulation designs have been developed for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) that are superior to classical spinal cord stimulation and exert their effects without the mandatory paresthesia. Two such stimulation designs are burst stimulation and 10 kHz stimulation.
Whereas the mechanism of action of burst SCS has been partly elucidated, in that it modulates the medial pain pathway in contrast to tonic stimulation, the mechanism of action of 10 kHz SCS is still enigmatic. The goal of this paper is to provide a perspective or informed opinion on the differences and similarities between burst SCS and 10 kHz stimulation by using a literature search on the two stimulation designs.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Human clinical data, simulation studies, quantitative sensory testing, cellular investigations, and comparative animal and human studies all point in the same direction, namely that 10 kHz and burst SCS might both modulate the medial pain pathway, and could be fundamentally similar neurostimulation designs.
脊髓刺激(SCS)通常用于治疗顽固性疼痛综合征。为使SCS有效,疼痛区域需要被SCS诱发的感觉异常症状所覆盖。最近,已开发出新型脊髓刺激(SCS)设计,其优于传统脊髓刺激,且无需强制性感觉异常即可发挥作用。两种此类刺激设计为脉冲刺激和10kHz刺激。
尽管脉冲SCS的作用机制已部分阐明,即与持续性刺激相比,它可调节内侧疼痛通路,但10kHz SCS的作用机制仍不明确。本文的目的是通过对这两种刺激设计进行文献检索,对脉冲SCS和10kHz刺激之间的异同提供一种观点或有根据的见解。
讨论/结论:人体临床数据、模拟研究、定量感觉测试、细胞研究以及比较性动物和人体研究均指向同一方向,即10kHz和脉冲SCS可能都调节内侧疼痛通路,并且可能是本质上相似的神经刺激设计。