• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马凡综合征的主动脉根部手术:单中心经验的中期结果

Aortic Root Surgery in Marfan Syndrome: Medium-Term Outcome in a Single-Center Experience.

作者信息

Attenhofer Jost Christine H, Connolly Heidi M, Scott Christopher G, Ammash Naser M, Bowen Juan M, Schaff Hartzell V

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. Electronic correspondence:

出版信息

J Heart Valve Dis. 2017 Jan;26(1):45-53.

PMID:28544831
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study aim was to analyze the authors' experience with aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome (MFS), and to expand the surgical outcome data of patients meeting the Ghent criteria (Marfan registry).

METHODS

Analyses were performed of data acquired from MFS patients (who met the Ghent criteria), including an aortic root surgery and Kaplan-Meier survival.

RESULTS

Between April 2004 and February 2012, a total of 59 MFS patients (mean age at surgery 36 ± 13 years) underwent 67 operations for aortic root aneurysm (n = 52), aortic valve (AV) regurgitation (n = 15), acute aortic dissection (n = 2), and/or mitral valve (MV) regurgitation resulting from MV prolapse (n = 7). Of 59 initial operations, 21 (36%) involved AV-replacing root surgery, 38 (64%) AV-sparing root surgery, seven (12%) aortic arch or hemi-arch repair, and five (8%) simultaneous MV surgery. There were no early mortalities. The mean follow up was 6.8 ± 1.2 years, with five deaths (8%) and a relatively low reoperation rate (10 reoperations in nine patients; 14%). Seven reoperations involved AV or aortic root surgery (including four for AV regurgitation following failed AV-sparing surgery), two MV repair/replacements, and one coronary artery bypass graft. Eight patients (21%) with AV-sparing surgery had moderate/severe AV regurgitation at the last follow up before re-intervention. The mean five-year freedom from postoperative death was 91.2 ± 8.8%, from cardiac reoperation 86.3 ± 4.5%, and more-than-moderate AV regurgitation 90.3 ± 4.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic aortic surgery in MFS patients with AV-replacing root or AV-sparing root surgery carries a low risk of operative morbidity and death when performed at an experienced center. AV-sparing root surgery increases the risk of AV regurgitation and, possibly, of re-intervention. Regular clinical follow up is important after any aortic root surgery in MFS patients, with a delineation of risk factors for AV regurgitation after AV rootsparing surgery.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析作者在马方综合征(MFS)患者中进行主动脉根部手术的经验,并扩充符合根特标准患者(马方综合征注册研究)的手术结果数据。

方法

对从符合根特标准的MFS患者获取的数据进行分析,包括主动脉根部手术及Kaplan-Meier生存分析。

结果

2004年4月至2012年2月期间,共有59例MFS患者(手术时平均年龄36±13岁)接受了67次手术,手术原因包括主动脉根部瘤(n = 52)、主动脉瓣(AV)反流(n = 15)、急性主动脉夹层(n = 2)和/或因二尖瓣(MV)脱垂导致的二尖瓣反流(n = 7)。在59例初次手术中,21例(36%)涉及置换主动脉瓣的根部手术,38例(64%)为保留主动脉瓣的根部手术,7例(12%)为主动脉弓或半弓修复,5例(8%)为同期二尖瓣手术。无早期死亡病例。平均随访时间为6.8±1.2年,5例死亡(8%),再手术率相对较低(9例患者10次再手术;14%)。7次再手术涉及主动脉瓣或主动脉根部手术(包括4例保留主动脉瓣手术失败后因主动脉瓣反流进行的手术),2例二尖瓣修复/置换,1例冠状动脉旁路移植术。8例(21%)接受保留主动脉瓣手术的患者在再次干预前的最后一次随访时出现中/重度主动脉瓣反流。术后5年无死亡的平均自由度为91.2±8.8%,无心脏再手术的平均自由度为86.3±4.5%,无中重度以上主动脉瓣反流的平均自由度为90.3±4.8%。

结论

在经验丰富的中心,对MFS患者进行置换主动脉瓣或保留主动脉瓣的预防性主动脉手术,手术并发症和死亡风险较低。保留主动脉瓣的根部手术会增加主动脉瓣反流以及可能再次干预的风险。MFS患者进行任何主动脉根部手术后,定期临床随访很重要,同时要明确保留主动脉瓣手术后主动脉瓣反流的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Aortic Root Surgery in Marfan Syndrome: Medium-Term Outcome in a Single-Center Experience.马凡综合征的主动脉根部手术:单中心经验的中期结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 2017 Jan;26(1):45-53.
2
Comparison of aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征患者主动脉根部置换的比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Nov;40(5):1052-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
3
Surgical management of the aortic root in patients with Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征患者主动脉根部的外科治疗
J Heart Valve Dis. 2005 Jan;14(1):121-8; discussion 128-9.
4
Outcomes of aortic valve repair: early results from the German Aortic Valve Registry.主动脉瓣修复的结果:来自德国主动脉瓣注册中心的早期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Sep 2;62(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac416.
5
Thoracic Aortic, Aortic Valve, and Mitral Valve Surgery in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Marfan Syndrome: Characteristics and Outcomes.马凡综合征患儿和青年成人患者的胸主动脉、主动脉瓣和二尖瓣手术:特点和结果。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Winter;31(4):818-825. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
6
Fifteen-Year Outcomes Following Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Elderly Patients.老年患者行保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部替换术后 15 年的结果。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Jan;31(1):144-152. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
7
Reoperations and late adverse outcome in Marfan patients following cardiovascular surgery.马凡氏综合征患者心血管手术后的再次手术及晚期不良结局
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 May;25(5):671-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.034.
8
Aortic valve-sparing surgery in Marfan syndrome.马凡综合征的保留主动脉瓣手术。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2013 Aug;15(8):439-42.
9
[Surgical treatment of cardiovascular manifestations of Marfan syndrome].马凡综合征心血管表现的外科治疗
Kyobu Geka. 2002 Jul;55(8 Suppl):658-62.
10
Long-term outcomes of aortic root operations for Marfan syndrome: A comparison of Bentall versus aortic valve-sparing procedures.马凡综合征主动脉根部手术的长期结果:Bentall手术与保留主动脉瓣手术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Feb;151(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.068. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of thoracic aortic interventions in Marfan syndrome in the state of Texas over 11 years.德克萨斯州11年间马凡综合征患者胸主动脉介入治疗的结果。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Aug 3;37(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad128.
2
Marfan syndrome: improved clinical history results in expanded natural history.马凡综合征:改良临床病史可导致扩展的自然病史。
Genet Med. 2019 Aug;21(8):1683-1690. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0399-4. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
3
Redo Aortic Root Operations in Patients with Marfan Syndrome.马方综合征患者的主动脉根部再次手术
Int J Angiol. 2018 Jun;27(2):92-97. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649485. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
Con: "Debate: does every ascending aorta repair require at least an open distal anastomosis at the innominate? Or not?".反对观点:“辩论:每例升主动脉修复术是否都至少需要在无名动脉处进行开放远端吻合?还是不需要?”
J Vis Surg. 2018 Mar 13;4:49. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2018.02.05. eCollection 2018.