Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚和新西兰土著人群的情绪和焦虑障碍:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Mood and anxiety disorders in Australia and New Zealand's indigenous populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Rural Clinical School, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia.

University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Woolloongabba, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2017 Sep;255:128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 May 10.

Abstract

The Indigenous populations of Australia and New Zealand are considered at higher risk of mood and anxiety disorders but many studies do not include direct comparisons with similar non-Indigenous controls. We conducted a systematic search of relevant electronic databases, as well as snowballing and targeted searches of the grey literature. Studies were included for meta-analysis if they compared rates of mood and anxiety disorders between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians or Maori. Seven Australian and 10 NZ studies were included. Overall, Indigenous people in both countries did not have significantly higher rates of disorder. However, in terms of specific disorders, there were differences in risk by gender, country (Australia or NZ), disorder type, and prevalence (current, 12-month or lifetime). For instance, Indigenous Australians and Maori both had significantly lower rates of simple phobias (current prevalence) and Maori participants had significantly lower rates of both lifetime simple phobia and generalised anxiety disorders. By contrast, Indigenous Australians had significantly higher rates of bipolar affective disorder and social phobia (current prevalence). Generalisations regarding the risk of psychiatric disorders in Indigenous people cannot therefore be made as this varies by several factors. These include disorder type, sociodemographic factors, Indigenous origin and study method.

摘要

澳大利亚和新西兰的原住民被认为患情绪和焦虑障碍的风险更高,但许多研究并未将其与相似的非原住民对照组进行直接比较。我们对相关电子数据库进行了系统检索,并对灰色文献进行了滚雪球式和有针对性的搜索。如果研究比较了澳大利亚和新西兰原住民与非原住民之间的情绪和焦虑障碍的发生率,则将其纳入荟萃分析。纳入了 7 项澳大利亚研究和 10 项新西兰研究。总体而言,两国的原住民情绪障碍和焦虑障碍的发生率并没有显著更高。然而,在特定的疾病方面,风险存在性别、国家(澳大利亚或新西兰)、疾病类型和流行程度(当前、12 个月或终生)方面的差异。例如,澳大利亚原住民和毛利人当前的单纯恐惧症发病率均显著较低,而毛利人终生单纯恐惧症和广泛性焦虑症的发病率也显著较低。相比之下,澳大利亚原住民的双相情感障碍和社交恐惧症的发病率则显著较高。因此,不能一概而论地认为原住民患精神障碍的风险更高,因为这取决于多种因素。这些因素包括疾病类型、社会人口因素、原住民身份和研究方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验