Cento Valeria, Nguyen Thi Huyen Tram, Di Carlo Domenico, Biliotti Elisa, Gianserra Laura, Lenci Ilaria, Di Paolo Daniele, Calvaruso Vincenza, Teti Elisabetta, Cerrone Maddalena, Romagnoli Dante, Melis Michela, Danieli Elena, Menzaghi Barbara, Polilli Ennio, Siciliano Massimo, Nicolini Laura Ambra, Di Biagio Antonio, Magni Carlo Federico, Bolis Matteo, Antonucci Francesco Paolo, Di Maio Velia Chiara, Alfieri Roberta, Sarmati Loredana, Casalino Paolo, Bernardini Sergio, Micheli Valeria, Rizzardini Giuliano, Parruti Giustino, Quirino Tiziana, Puoti Massimo, Babudieri Sergio, D'Arminio Monforte Antonella, Andreoni Massimo, Craxì Antonio, Angelico Mario, Pasquazzi Caterina, Taliani Gloria, Guedj Jeremie, Perno Carlo Federico, Ceccherini-Silberstein Francesca
Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, IAME, UMR 1137, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177352. eCollection 2017.
Intracellular HCV-RNA reduction is a proposed mechanism of action of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), alternative to hepatocytes elimination by pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin (PR). We modeled ALT and HCV-RNA kinetics in cirrhotic patients treated with currently-used all-DAA combinations to evaluate their mode of action and cytotoxicity compared with telaprevir (TVR)+PR.
Mathematical modeling of ALT and HCV-RNA kinetics was performed in 111 HCV-1 cirrhotic patients, 81 treated with all-DAA regimens and 30 with TVR+PR. Kinetic-models and Cox-analysis were used to assess determinants of ALT-decay and normalization.
HCV-RNA kinetics was biphasic, reflecting a mean effectiveness in blocking viral production >99.8%. The first-phase of viral-decline was faster in patients receiving NS5A-inhibitors compared to TVR+PR or sofosbuvir+simeprevir (p<0.001), reflecting higher efficacy in blocking assembly/secretion. The second-phase, noted δ and attributed to infected-cell loss, was faster in patients receiving TVR+PR or sofosbuvir+simeprevir compared to NS5A-inhibitors (0.27 vs 0.21 d-1, respectively, p = 0.0012). In contrast the rate of ALT-normalization, noted λ, was slower in patients receiving TVR+PR or sofosbuvir+simeprevir compared to NS5A-inhibitors (0.17 vs 0.27 d-1, respectively, p<0.001). There was no significant association between the second-phase of viral-decline and ALT normalization rate and, for a given level of viral reduction, ALT-normalization was more profound in patients receiving DAA, and NS5A in particular, than TVR+PR.
Our data support a process of HCV-clearance by all-DAA regimens potentiated by NS5A-inhibitor, and less relying upon hepatocyte death than IFN-containing regimens. This may underline a process of "cell-cure" by DAAs, leading to a fast improvement of liver homeostasis.
细胞内丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)RNA水平降低是直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)的一种作用机制,这是聚乙二醇化干扰素联合利巴韦林(PR)清除肝细胞外病毒的替代机制。我们对正在使用的全DAA联合治疗方案治疗的肝硬化患者的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)和HCV-RNA动力学进行建模,以评估其作用模式和细胞毒性,并与特拉匹韦(TVR)+PR进行比较。
对111例HCV-1肝硬化患者进行ALT和HCV-RNA动力学的数学建模,其中81例接受全DAA治疗方案,30例接受TVR+PR治疗。采用动力学模型和Cox分析评估ALT下降和恢复正常的决定因素。
HCV-RNA动力学呈双相性,反映出在阻断病毒产生方面的平均有效性>99.8%。与TVR+PR或索磷布韦+西米普明相比,接受NS5A抑制剂治疗的患者病毒下降的第一阶段更快(p<0.001),这反映出在阻断病毒组装/分泌方面具有更高的疗效。第二阶段,标记为δ,归因于受感染细胞的损失,与NS5A抑制剂相比,接受TVR+PR或索磷布韦+西米普明治疗的患者第二阶段更快(分别为0.27和每天0.21,p = 0.0012)。相比之下,与NS5A抑制剂相比,接受TVR+PR或索磷布韦+西米普明治疗的患者ALT恢复正常的速率(标记为λ)较慢(分别为0.17和每天0.27,p<0.001)。病毒下降的第二阶段与ALT恢复正常速率之间无显著关联,并且在病毒降低水平相同的情况下,接受DAA治疗(尤其是NS5A)的患者ALT恢复正常的程度比接受TVR+PR治疗的患者更深。
我们的数据支持NS5A抑制剂增强全DAA治疗方案清除HCV的过程,并且与含干扰素的治疗方案相比,较少依赖肝细胞死亡。这可能突出了DAA的“细胞治愈”过程,导致肝脏内环境稳态快速改善。