Madsen Christoffer Valdorff, Bundgaard Henning, Rasmussen Åse Krogh, Sørensen Søren Schwartz, Petersen Jørgen Holm, Køber Lars, Feldt-Rasmussen Ulla, Petri Helle
a Department of Medical Endocrinology , Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark.
b Department of Cardiology, Unit for Inherited Cardiac Diseases , Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2017 Aug;51(4):207-216. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2017.1332383. Epub 2017 May 25.
In patients with Fabry disease (FD), left ventricular hypertrophy and arrhythmias are frequently observed and cardiac involvement is the leading cause of death. Long-term efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) on cardiac involvement is unclear. We assessed and compared long-term progression of cardiac involvement according to ERT and non-ERT.
We retrospectively assessed and compared long-term progression of cardiac involvement in adult patients with FD in the nationwide Danish cohort. We followed clinical signs, symptoms and findings by echocardiography, electrocardiography and Holter-monitoring.
We included 66 patients; 47 patients (27 women) received ERT (ERT group) and 19 patients (15 women) did not (non-ERT group). The groups were followed for a median of 8 [0-12] years and 6 [0-13] years, respectively. Comparison between ERT and non-ERT receiving patients by left ventricular mass (echocardiographic assessment) and Sokolow-Lyon voltage- and Cornell product criteria (electrocardiographic assessment) revealed no significant differences. In the ERT group, we observed no change in left ventricular mass but a decrease in Sokolow-Lyon voltage- and Cornell product criteria from baseline to follow-up; 30 mm [15-53] vs. 25 mm [3-44], p < 0.005 and 1710 mm·ms [480-3740] vs. 1520 mm·ms [550-5740], p < .05, respectively. There were no changes within the non-ERT group. During follow-up, cardiac symptoms and use of cardiovascular procedures and -medication increased significantly in the ERT group, whereas no differences were observed within the non-ERT group.
We raise concerns regarding the efficacy and benefit of ERT on cardiac involvement in Fabry disease and stress the need for further research.
在法布里病(FD)患者中,常观察到左心室肥厚和心律失常,心脏受累是主要死因。酶替代疗法(ERT)对心脏受累的长期疗效尚不清楚。我们评估并比较了ERT和非ERT治疗下心脏受累的长期进展情况。
我们回顾性评估并比较了丹麦全国队列中成年FD患者心脏受累的长期进展情况。我们通过超声心动图、心电图和动态心电图监测来跟踪临床体征、症状和检查结果。
我们纳入了66例患者;47例患者(27名女性)接受了ERT(ERT组),19例患者(15名女性)未接受(非ERT组)。两组的随访时间中位数分别为8 [0 - 12]年和6 [0 - 13]年。通过左心室质量(超声心动图评估)以及索科洛夫 - 里昂电压和康奈尔乘积标准(心电图评估)对接受ERT和未接受ERT的患者进行比较,未发现显著差异。在ERT组中,我们观察到左心室质量无变化,但从基线到随访时索科洛夫 - 里昂电压和康奈尔乘积标准有所下降;分别为30 mm [15 - 53] vs. 25 mm [3 - 44],p < 0.005以及1710 mm·ms [480 - 3740] vs. 1520 mm·ms [550 - 5740],p < 0.05。非ERT组内无变化。在随访期间,ERT组的心脏症状以及心血管手术和药物的使用显著增加,而非ERT组未观察到差异。
我们对ERT治疗法布里病心脏受累的疗效和益处表示担忧,并强调需要进一步研究。